Archive
2011 year, issue 3 read »
«The Ethnology Notebooks» 2020 year, issue 3 read »
2012 year, issue 5 read »
2011 year, issue 1 read »

« 2017. #2 (134)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2017, 2 (134), 441—447

UDK 7.038.6

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2017.02.441

INNOVATIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES IN MODERN ART

Bystriakova Valentyna, Associate Professor

in Kiev National University of Technology and Design

Department of drawing and painting,

Volodymyra Nemyrovycha-Danchenko Street, 2, 01011, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Contacts: e-mail: krg@knutd.edu.ua

Osadcha Alla Mykolaivna, Senior teacher

in Kiev National University of Technology and Design

Department of drawing and painting,

Volodymyra Nemyrovycha-Danchenko Street, 2, 01011, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Contacts: E-mail: alla_0203@ukr.net

Pilhuk Olesia,

Kiev National University of Technology and Design

Department of drawing and painting,

Volodymyra Nemyrovycha-Danchenko Street, 2, 01011, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Contacts: e-mail: krg@knutd.edu.ua

Abstract. In the article the attempt of analysis of the systems of innovative approaches and innovative technologies in a modern art is carried out. The different scientific and legal going is offered near interpretation of term «innovation». Understanding of essence of innovations in a culture is investigated. The features of application of innovative technologies are considered in the diffe­rent spheres of culture, in particular in fine art. The role of innovative technologies is exposed in the postmodern art.

Keywords: innovations, technologies, modern art, culture, cultureronik, values, tradition, postmodern, conception.

Received 14.03.2017

REFERENCES

Balabanov, I.T. (2001). Innovacionyj menedzhment. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter [in Russian].
Volyk, N.H. (2013). Innovatsijni suspil’ni protsesy i moral’nyj vybir. Totallogy XXI. Postneklasichni doslidzhennia, 30, 265—273 [in Ukrainian].
Vujma, A.H. (2013). Tradytsii ta novatorstvo iak dvi protylezhnosti v dialektytsi kul’tury. In Problema tradytsii v ukrains’kij kul’turi: materialy Vse-ukrains’koi naukovopraktychnoikh konferentsii kursantiv, studentiv ta molodykh uchenykh (pp.36—38). Kharkiv: NUTsZU [in Ukrainian].
Gvishiani, D.M. (2006). Dialektika i sistemnyj analiz. Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].
Druker, P.F. (2007). Zadachi menedzhmenta v XXI veke. Moskva: Vil’jams [in Russian].
Zhaldak, H. & Simchenko, N. (2012). Klasyfikatsiia innovatsij ta ikh sotsial’nyj pidvyd. In Ekonomichnyj analiz (Vol. 10 (4), pp. 92—95) [in Ukrainian].
Kyrylenko, K.M. (2015). Pidkhody do rozuminnia innovatsijnoi kul’tury v konteksti su-chasnoho naukovoho dyskursu ta ikh naskrizni idei. Pytannia kul’turolohii, 31, 64—71 [in Ukrainian].
Koiuda, O.P. & Nebylytsia, O.A. (2009). Innovatsijna kul’tura ta ii kharakterni osoblyvosti. Problemy nauky, 7, 15—20 [in Ukrainian].
Konvers’kyj, A.Ye. (Ed.). (2013). Kul’turolohiia: pidruch. dlia studentiv vysch. navch. zakl. Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian].
Liotar, Zh.F. & Shmako N.A. (per. s fr.). (1998). Sostojanie postmoderna = La condition postmoderne. Sankt-Peterburg: Aletejja [in Russian].
Miliutina, Yu.S. (2011). Dyskusijni pytannia schodo vyznachennia poniat’ «innovatsiia» ta «novovvedennia». Universytets’ki naukovi zapysky, 4, 454—462 [in Ukrainian].
Molchanova, L.A. (2011). Innovacii v zhivopisi vtoroj poloviny XX veka. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovanija, 6 (31), 201—202 [in Russian].
Molchanova, L.A. (2010). Ponjatija «innovacija» i «tradicija» v iskusstve. In Snitkovskie chtenija. (pp. 37—43). Barnaul: Altajskij dom pechati [in Russian].
Sydorenko, V. (Ed.). (2006). Narysy z istorii obrazotvorchoho mystetstva Ukrainy XX st. (Vol. 2). Kyiv: Intertekhnolohiia [in Ukrainian].
Nepomnjashhij, A.V. & Pisarenko B.I. (2007). Innovacionnoe obrazovanie: dostizhenija i perspektivy. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnja, 7, 14—19 [in Russian].
Nesterenko, O.S. (2013). Klasyfikatsiia vydiv innovatsij ta efektiv vid ikh vprovadzhennia. Visnyk sotsial’noekonomichnykh doslidzhen’, 4, 112—117 [in Ukrainian].
Gricanov, A.A. (Ed.). (2007). Novejshij filosofskij slovar’. Postmodernizm. Minsk: Sovremennyj literator [in Russian].
Pro innovatsijnu diial’nist’: Zakon Ukrainy: zi zminamy. (2003). In Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR),13, 93 [in Ukrainian].
Sobol’, T.V. (2014). Filosofskij analiz soderzhanija ponjatij «kul’tura», «innovacija» i «innovacionnaja kul’tura». Molodoj uchenyj, 13, 337—341 [in Russian].
Starovojt, O.V. (2014). Kreatyvna pryroda innovatsijnoi kul’tury. Visnyk Instytutu rozvytku dytyny. Seriia: Filosofiia, pedahohika, psykholohiia, 32, 36—42 [in Ukrainian].
SukhovejKhamm, Yu.O. (2012). Teoretychni pidkhody do traktuvannia poniattia innovatsij u suchasnij naukovij literature. Naukovi pratsi MAUP 4, 180—184 [in Ukrainian].
Usovskaja, Je.A. (2006). Postmodernizm. Minsk: TetraSistem [in Russian].
Ushkalov, L. (2011). Vid baroko do postmodernu: esei. Kyiv: Hrani T [in Ukrainian].
Shumpeter, J. (2007). Teorija jekonomicheskogo razvitija. Moskva: Jeksmo [in Russian].
Jepshtejn, M.N. (2004). Znak probela: O budushhem gumanitarnyh nauk. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [in Russian].

Read»

Our authors
Ulana Movna. Senior Research Fellow, Ph.D. in History. read »
Kuzmenko Oksana Senior Researcher, Candidate of... read »
Olena Nykorak. Senior Researcher, Doctor of Arts read »
Stepan Pavluk. Prof., full member of NAS of Ukraine,... read »
Wax candle as ukrainian Christmas and epiphany ritualistic text
For the first time in native ethnology the article has brought some results of special study in sign functionality of a wax candle under the context of Ukrainian Christmas and Epiphany ritualistic text (ritualism of Christmas Eve, New Year, Epiphany Eve and Feast of Epiphany). The study has stated extremely high semiotic position of a wax candle as projection of Sun, mediator between the spheres of sacral and prophane elements, symbolic analogue of human existence, apotropy, cultural symbol re-establishing borders of acculturated space.
Read »

Daily bread baking of ukrainians in the south-western ethnographical region at the late XIX to early XXI cc.
The paper has dealt with analytic study in prescriptions, signs, customs, methods, ways of selection, procurement and some peculiarities in usage of subsidiary means — water, firewood and leaves in bread baking. The final aim of the mentioned actions had been (and still is) selection of the means and ingredients fit, by their characteristics, for the backing of bread. The paper has demonstrated dependence of bread backing subsi­diary means criteria from the folk nutritional standards and world outlook stereotypes as well as from regional social and economic, natural and geographical factors and peculiarities of material culture.
Read »

On field exploration of russian and belarusian ethnologists and etnolinguists in Ukrainian Polisia 1945—1980s
In the study based on a wide range of literary materials have been comprehensively characterised field research in Polisia of Ukraine, performed by Russian and Belarusian ethnologists during 1945—1980s as well as Moscow ethnolinguists and other researchers from ethnologic centres of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus in the course of realization of Ethnolinguistic Atlas of Polisia program. Particular attention has been paid to geography, methods, themes and research results of scientific projects.
Read »

On bessarabian and moldavian ukrainians in the studies of historical ethnography
The article has thrown some light upon a sum of scientific findings got during XIX to XXI cc. in historio-ethnographic studies of Bessarabia and Moldavian Ukrainians. In the pre­sent paper has been given author’s answer to the problem of lacking progress as for the numerous themes concerning Ukrainians. State and achievements of the research-works in Ukrainians’ material and spiritual culture by the scientists of Moldavia and Ukraine through the years of independence has been exposed.
Read »