The Ethnology Notebooks. 2025. № 6 (186), 1519—1532
UDK 75.021.3:004.056:351.853
THE PROBLEM OF PROTECTING OF ARTWORKS FROM THEFT AND COUNTERFEITING USING INVISIBLE MARKING
BEVZ Mykola
- ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1513-7045
- ScD (Arch.), Professor, Professor of Department
- of Conservation of Monuments,
- Lublin University of Technology,
- 40, Nadbystrzycka st., Lublin 20-618, Poland;
- Head of Department of Architecture and Conservation,
- Lviv Polytechnic National University,
- 12, Bandera str., 79013, Lviv, Ukraine,
- Contacts: e-mail: m.bevz@pollub.pl
CHUKHRAY Nataliya
- ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-3143
- ScD (Econ.), Professor,
- Head of Department
- of Management of Organization,
- Lviv Polytechnic National University,
- 12, Bandery str., 79013, Lviv, Ukraine,
- Contacts: e-mail: natalia.i.chuhray@lpnu.ua
MIRABILE Antonio
- ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8676-1828
- Paper Conservator,
- accredited by French Ministry of Culture, UNESCO expert,
- 11, Rue de Bellefond, 75009, Paris, France,
- Contacts: e-mail: antonio.mirabile@gmail.com
Abstract. Relevance. Currently, there is a standard requirement in the museum sector to mark exhibits with identification information, including artworks. These markers must contain the museum’s abbreviation and the inventory number of the work of art. Usually, these markers are applied in pencil or ink and placed in a visible location to ensure they can be found quickly. Their location, color, and application technique are regulated by the museum’s internal protocols. In addition to these visible markings, many museums also use their own invisible identifiers to protect against theft and forgery. However, a standardized approach to such markers has not yet emerged.
The aim of the study is to analyze different types of artworks and identify how invisible marking can be applied to them in terms of effective protection and minimal impact on the artwork itself.
The objects of the study are various types of artworks found in museum collections (from coins or medals to paintings or sculptures). The research methodology involves a review of the most accessible methods of invisible marking. A comparative analysis of the protection of various works of art using chemical markers was performed.
Results. Analysis of various types of works of art and museum objects revealed difficulties associated with determining the optimal placement and size of invisible chemical markers. These markers serve as a deterrent against theft and play a decisive role in the detection and return of lost or stolen items. Each work of art should be marked with a unique code or digital identifier using fluorescent mapping technology. This system allows the marker to be read using portable devices. The results of the analysis indicate that the key issue is that markers should be applied to the artwork itself, rather than to frames or attached labels. Tests carried out as part of the European research project «AURORA» have experimentally confirmed the feasibility of using cost-effective, durable chemical markers.
Conclusions. Specific requirements for the methodology of applying chemical markers and their size have been formulated. Recommendations have been developed for selecting the location for applying markers depending on the type of artwork. To determine the optimal marking location, a preliminary in-depth analysis of the work should be performed. The analysis should include knowledge of the material or materials from which the work is made, their durability, their stability, etc. The marking location should be the point of least threat to the valuable characteristics of the work and, at the same time, be a sufficiently important point of identification. Depending on the optimal marking location selected, the appropriate shape and size of the chemical marker must be determined in advance. The type, shape, and size of the marker depend on the work of art itself. Marking can be applied manually or mechanically. The form of marking can vary from a dispersed dot structure to a stamp with an inscription, sign, logo, or QR code.
Keywords: artwork, chemical marking, anti-counterfeiting, theft protection.
Received 10.11.2025
REFERENCES
- Skaldawski, Bartosz. (2011). Cooperation between services combating crimes aganst cultural heritage and institutions specializing in monument protection. In: L. Ramskjaer, A. Nyhamar, A. Chabiera, M. Aniszewski. Stop Heritage Crime. Good practices and recommendations (Pp. 91—97). Warszawa: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa.
- Skotnikova, Olga. (2023). A two-hundred-year-old Bible, rare books and coins were not allowed to be taken out of Ukraine at the border. Retrieved from: https://vechirniy.kyiv.ua/news/80925/ (Last accessed: 10.12.2024) [in Ukrainian].
- Instruktsia. (2016, July 21). On the Approval of the Instruction for Organizing the Accounting of Museum Objects. Procedure for applying markings to museum objects, 580. Retrieved from: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ESK8mgKHlC8qp9T7WXB_XYiV6f1IQocgSenSkD18N90/edit?usp=drivesdk (Last accessed: 12.11.2024) [in Ukrainian].
- Larin, D., Pushnova, T., & Kabatsiy, M. (2023). If you need a museum only to bring guests, it’s better to build a warehouse: Fedir Androshchuk, director of the National Museum of History. Retrieved from: https://life.pravda.com.ua/culture/2023/10/30/257267/ (Last accessed: 12.01.2024). [in Ukrainian].
- (1995, June 24). UNIDROIT Convention. The UNID-ROIT Convention on stolen or illegally exported cultu-ral obiect». Retrieved from: https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/cultural-property/1995-convention/ (Last accessed: 12.11.2024).
- Florianowicz, Paulina. (2011). Implementing the educational strategies of the National Heritage Board of Poland within the Scope of Combating Crime against archeological heritage. In: L. Ramskjaer, A. Nyhamar, A. Chabiera. Stop Heritage Crime. Good practices and recommendations (Pp. 103—106). Warszawa: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa.
- Ramskjaer, L., Nyhamar, A., & Chabiera, A. (2011). Stop Heritage Crime. Good practices and recommendations. Warszawa: Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa. Retrieved from: https://www.obs-traffic.museum/sites/default/files/ressources/ files/Stop_Heritage _Crime_Poland_Norway.pdf (Last accessed: 10.12.2024).
- Mansuri, Shahid. (2025). How AI in RFID Data Analysis Improves Operational Accuracy. RFID Journaul. Retrieved from: https://www.rfidjournal.com/expert-views/how-ai-in-rfid-data-analysis-improves-operational-accuracy/224143/ (Last accessed: 17.10.2025).
- (2025). Smartwater. The System «Smart Water». Retrieved from: https://swt.smartwater.com/heritage/ and https://detertech.com/solutions/smartwater/ (Last accessed: 12.01.2025).
- (2023). AURORA. Digital identity, novel chemical markers, and tracking systems to counteract illicit trafficking of artworks. Concept, Methogology. Retrieved from: https://www.aurora-euproject.eu/ (Last accessed: 12.11.2024).
- Chukhray, Natalia. (2023).Artwork Unique RecognitiOn and tracking through chemical encoded data, miniaturized devices and blockchain alliance (Pp. 1—2). Retrieved from: https://www.aurora-euproject.eu/ and https://lpnu.ua/aurora (Last accessed: 12.11.2024).
- Kozyreva, Tetiana. (2023). For the first time in 80 years! Restored icons from the second half of the 16th century were presented in Lviv. The Icons of the «Last Judgment» and «The Passion of Christ» from the 1660s—1670s from the Church of the Ascension of the Lord; village of Bagnuvate, Turkiv district, Lviv region. Photo by P. Palamarchuk. Retrieved from: https://day.kyiv.ua/article/taym-aut/vpershe-za-80-rokiv. (Last accessed: 10.01.2025) [in Ukrainian].
- Buko, A., & Golub, S. (2019). From the cathedral church of King Daniel Romanowicz to the Basilica of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Chelm. Chelm: Muzeum Ziemi Cheіmskiej im. Wiktora Ambroziewicza [in Polish].
- Muvija, M. (2023, October 18). British Museum to fully digitise collection after «inside job» thefts. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/british-museum-digitise-its-entire-collection-after-theft-incident-2023-10-18/ (Last accessed: 15.12.2024).
- (2024). HeMo. Ukrainian Heritage Monitoring Lab: HeMo. Retrieved from: https://www.heritage.in.ua/ (Last accessed: 22.12.2024).
- (2024). Museum. Museum Digitization Center. Lviv. Retrie-ved from: https://www.heritage.in.ua /digitalization. (Last ac-cessed: 24.12.2024).
- Hikli, Katrin. (2021). How do you spot a lo-o-ted anti-que. Re-trieved from: https://www.the-art-newspaper.com/2021/ 08/10/how-do-you–spot-a-looted-antique-ger-ma-ny-brings-in-team-of-ex-perts-to-help. (Last accessed: 10.12.2024).
- Katyshew, K. (2024). Korrespondent. Robbers brazenly stole a sculpture worth 7 million euros from a museum in France. Skulpture Via Vitae before the robbery. Photo: Rachida Dati/Х. Retrieved from: https://novosti-n.org/ua/news/U-Francziyi-grabizhnyky-zuhvalo-vkraly-z-muzeyu-skulpturu-za-7-mln-yevro-304233 (Last accessed: 10.01.2025) [in Ukrainian].