Archive
«Narodoznavchi Zoshyty» 2016 year, issue 3 read »
The Ethnology Notebooks. 2022. #3 (165). P. 523-744 DOI... read »
«Narodoznavchi Zoshyty» 2018 year, issue 3 read »
The Ethnology Notebooks. 2021. #5 (161). P. 1033– DOI... read »

« 2018. #4 (142)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2018,  № 4 (142), 825–831

UDK 94(44):20

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2018.04.825

Received 16.03.2018

THE GENESIS AND INTERPRETATION THE CONCEPT OF  «RELIGION» IN SOCIAL AND HUMANITARIAN SCIENCES

Lutsiv Olena Yuriivna, laboratory assistant and Ph.D student of the department of social anthropology of the Institute of Ethnology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,

Svobody Avenue 15,  79000, Lviv, Ukraine

Contacts: Tel. (097)2556640; e–mail: olenka.lutsiv@gmail.com

Abstrakt. The article examines the evolution of the understanding of religion from antiquity to modern times. While in the antiquity the main views on religion were focused on the nature and the role of God, as well as the reasons for the existence of religious beliefs, Christianity offered new directions to the interpretation of religion and religious world view. First of all, the philosophical and theological views of participants of the I–IV Ecumenical Councils were united in a new doctrine – patristics. Exactly this doctirne, revealed the essence of God, faith and the function of religion in a completely new way. From the beginning of the New Age, the study and analysis of religion have become much more active. This is due to the scientific revolution that took place in the 16th–17th centuries. It was the time when G. Galilei created a new way of acquiring knowledge – scientific method before that time the interpretation of various concepts and views had been carried out through the prism of philosophy, which included various kinds of knowledge. Eventually, philosophical knowledge has dynamically overgrown into a scientific one, where division into a variety of scientific disciplines occured. Religion was studied by many of them (philosophy, anthropology, psychology, sociology of religion, etc.). Understanding of religion within the philosophical and scientific views also differs with methods and ways of cognition.  First of all, scientific views explain the essence and the origin of religion through empirical studies of nature and society. Besides, science has developed an interdisciplinary approach where an explanation of any concept is possible in dealing with related disciplines. Nevertheless, religion can’t be perceived only by scientific method. Religion involves spiritual–sensory knowledge which expresses philosophical views. In addition, the article presents the author’s definition of “religion” concept which shows the unity between man and God through communication with him, veneration, and worshiping through the implementation of various religious practices.

Keywords: religion, religiosity, philosophy of religion, anthropology of religion, psychology of religion, sociology of religion.

REFERENCES

Akvinskij, T., Eremeev, S., (Per. s lat.), & Judin, A., (Per. s lat.). (2002). Voprosy 1–43. In Summa Teologii (Chast’ 1).  Kiev–Moskva: Jel’ga; Jel’kor–MK [in Russian].
Sokolov, V.V. (Ed.). (1969). Antologija mirovoj filosofii (Vol. 1, part 1). Moskva: Mysl’ [in Russian].
Veber, M. (1994). Protestants’ka etyka i dukh kapitalizmu. Kyiv: Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
Gegel’, G.V., & Levina, M.I. (Per. s nem.). (1975). Filosofija religii (Vol. 1, pp. 16–275). Moskva: Mysl’  [in Russian].
Girc, K. (2004). Interpretacija kul’tur (pp. 88–124). Moskva: Rossijskaja politicheskaja jenciklopedija [in Russian].
Dakhnij, A.J. (2015). Narysy istorii zakhidnoi filosofii XIX–XX st.: navch. posibnyk (pp. 231–258). L’viv: LNU imeni Ivana Franka [in Ukrainian].
Diurkhajm, E. (2002). Pervisni formy relihijnoho zhyttia. Totemna systema v Avstralii. Kyiv: Yunivers [in Ukrainian].
Zimmel’, G. (2015). Izbrannoe. Problemy sociologii (pp. 83–112). Moskva; Sankt–Peterburg [in Russian].
Kulahina, H. (2009). Psykholohiia relihii iak dystsyplinarne utvorennia. Ukrains’ke relihiieznavstvo, 1, 85–100  [in Ukrainian].
Lobovyk, B. (1996). Relihiia iak fenomen i katehoriia relihiieznavstva. Ukrains’ke relihiieznavstvo, 4, 3–12 [in Ukrainian].
Gricanov, A.A.,  Abushenko, V.L., Evel’kin, G.M., & Sokolova, G.N. (2003). Sociologija. Jenicklopedija.  Mn.: Knizhnyj dom [in Russian].
Konstantinov, F.V. (Ed.). (1967). Filosofskaja jenciklopedija. (Vol. 4, p. 53).  Moskva: Nauka logiki – Sigeti [in Russian].
Frjezer, Dzh. (1988). Zolotaja vetv’: Issledovanie magii i religii. Moskva: AST [in Russian].
Fromm, E. (2010). Psihoanaliz i religija. Moskva: Ast [in Russian].
Popov, I., Muchennik. (2006). Konspekt lekcij po patrologii. Tver’: Bulat [in Russian].
Pals D.L. (2006).  Eight theories of religion (2nd ed).  USA: Oxford University Press.
Buber, M. Dva obraza very. Perevod s nemeckogo / pod redakciej P.S. Gurevicha, S.Ja. Levit, S.V. Lezova.  Retrieved from: http://lib.ru/FILOSOF/BUBER/vera.txt  (Last accessed: 15.01.2018).
Garadzha, V.I. Religija kak predmet sociologicheskogo analiza. Retrieved from: http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/bogoslov/SocRelig/_Intro.php (Last accessed: 15.01.2018).
Kant, I. Religija v predelah tol’ko razuma. Retrieved from: http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/kant/rel_ind.php  (Last accessed: 15.01.2018).
Tajlor, J.B. Pervobytnaja kul’tura. Retrieved from: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/History/Tail/ (Last accessed: 15.01.2018).
Fejerbah, L. Sushhnost’ religii. Retrieved from: https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=71068  (Last accessed: 15.01.2018).
Frojd, Z. Psihicheskij genezis religioznyh predstavlenij. Retrieved from: http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/bogoslov/SocRelig/_Intro.php (Last accessed: 19.03.2014).
Frojd Z. Totem i tabu. Retrieved from: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Psihol/fr_tabu/ (Last accessed: 15.01.2018).

Read»

Our authors
Yaroslav Taras. Head of Department, Professor, Doctor... read »
Stepan Pavluk. Prof., full member of NAS of Ukraine,... read »
Oksana Kis. Senior scientific employee, candidate of... read »
Roman Radovych. Researcher, Ph.D. in History. read »
Maternity ritualism by volhynians in publications of the second half XIX to the early XXI cc.
In the article have been considered some basic landmarks for fixing and publication of ethnographic materials on the maternity rites of Volhynia with analytical study in ritual elements, their kinds and territories of origin. The article has also raised a problem of gaps in studies of maternity rites of Ukrainian historio-ethnographic Volhynia.
Read »

On field exploration of russian and belarusian ethnologists and etnolinguists in Ukrainian Polisia 1945—1980s
In the study based on a wide range of literary materials have been comprehensively characterised field research in Polisia of Ukraine, performed by Russian and Belarusian ethnologists during 1945—1980s as well as Moscow ethnolinguists and other researchers from ethnologic centres of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus in the course of realization of Ethnolinguistic Atlas of Polisia program. Particular attention has been paid to geography, methods, themes and research results of scientific projects.
Read »

On bessarabian and moldavian ukrainians in the studies of historical ethnography
The article has thrown some light upon a sum of scientific findings got during XIX to XXI cc. in historio-ethnographic studies of Bessarabia and Moldavian Ukrainians. In the pre­sent paper has been given author’s answer to the problem of lacking progress as for the numerous themes concerning Ukrainians. State and achievements of the research-works in Ukrainians’ material and spiritual culture by the scientists of Moldavia and Ukraine through the years of independence has been exposed.
Read »

Daily bread baking of ukrainians in the south-western ethnographical region at the late XIX to early XXI cc.
The paper has dealt with analytic study in prescriptions, signs, customs, methods, ways of selection, procurement and some peculiarities in usage of subsidiary means — water, firewood and leaves in bread baking. The final aim of the mentioned actions had been (and still is) selection of the means and ingredients fit, by their characteristics, for the backing of bread. The paper has demonstrated dependence of bread backing subsi­diary means criteria from the folk nutritional standards and world outlook stereotypes as well as from regional social and economic, natural and geographical factors and peculiarities of material culture.
Read »