« 2017. #3 (135)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2017, 3 (135), 566–578

UDK 746.5 : 391 ”38”] (477)

https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2017.03.566

ETHNIC ART TRADITION CONCEPT OF GLASSBEADED DECORATION IN UKRAINIAN NATIONAL COSTUME (PART 1)

Fedorchuk Olena Stepanivna, Senior Researcher,

Candidate of Art Studies, Department of Folk Art.

Svobody Avenue 15, 79000, Lviv, Ukraine.

Contacts: : tel.(032) 297-01-57; email: ina@mail.lviv.ua

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4724-3566

Abstract. In this paper the introductory principles of the ethnoart tradition concept the glassbeaded decoration of Ukrainian national costume is discussed. It is crucial to recognize the tradition as an evolutionary system, in which there are its own laws and highly predictable artistic processes occur. The research scientific no¬velty is represented by authors logical and intuitive reflection, which are based on the results 2001—2016 field researches.

Keywords: ethnic art tradition, passionate¬creative potential, laws of tradition, phases of ethnoart tradition, glassbeaded decoration of Ukrainian people’s adornment.

Received 6.04.2017

REFERENCES

Arkhiv IN NANU. F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 477. Fedorchuk O. ZKME IN NANU na Pokuttia ta pohranychni rajony (Tysmenyts’kyj, Tlumats’kyj, Kolomyjs’kyj, Horodenkivs’kyj rny Ivano-Frankivs’koi obl.) za 3–10 lypnia 2001 roku: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Arkhiv IN NANU. F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 499. Fedorchuk O. ZMV na Hutsul’schynu (Kosivs’kyj rn Ivano-Frankivs’koi obl.) za 9–11 serpnia 2002 roku: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Arkhiv IN NANU. F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 557a. Fedorchuk O. ZKME IN NANU na Bukovyns’ke Podillia ta Bessarabiiu (Zastavnivs’kyj, Khotyns’kyj, Sokyrians’kyj rny Chernivets’koi obl.) za 21 chervnia – 3 lypnia 2007 r.: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Arkhiv IN NANU. F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 581 b: Fedorchuk O. ZKME IN NANU na Bukovyns’ku Hutsul’schynu (Vyzhnyts’kyj, Putyl’s’kyj rny Chernivets’koi obl.) za 10–23 chervnia 2008 r.: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Arkhiv IN NANU. F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 636: Fedorchuk O. ZKME IN NANU do Ternopil’s’koi obl. (Berezhans’kyj, Kozivs’kyj, Pidhaiets’kyj, Buchats’kyj, Monastyrys’kyj, Zalischyts’kyj, Borschivs’kyj rna) za 3–16 chervnia 2011 r.: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Arkhiv IN NANU. F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 662: Fedorchuk O. ZMV IN NANU (Sopiv, Pechenizhyn Kolomyjs’koho rnu, Tyshkivtsi, Torhovytsia Horodenkivs’koho rnu Ivano-Frankivs’koi obl.) za 13–15 serpnia 2012 r.: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Arkhiv IN NANU. F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 706: Fedorchuk O. ZKE IN NANU na Pokuttia (Kolomyjs’kyj, Horodenkivs’kyj, Sniatyns’kyj rny Ivano-Frankivs’koi obl.) za 3–11 lypnia 2013 r.: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Arkhiv IN NANU.F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 706: Fedorchuk O. ZMV IN NANU na Hutsul’schynu (Kosivs’kyj ta Verkhovyns’kyj rny Ivano-Frankivs’koi obl.) za 23–27 serpnia 2013 r.: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Arkhiv IN NANU. F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 768: Fedorchuk O. ZKE IN NANU na Pokuttia (Tlumats’kyj, Tysmenyts’kyj ta Horodenkivs’kyj rny Ivano-Frankivs’koi obl.) za 2–12 lypnia 2014 r.: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Arkhiv IN NANU. F. 1. Op. 2. Od. zb. 768: Fedorchuk O. ZKE IN NANU na Pokuttia (Sniatyns’kyj ta Horodenkivs’kyj rny Ivano-Frankivs’koi obl., Kitsmans’kyj Chernivets’koi obl.) za 16 lypnia – 2 serpnia 2015 r.: BONN ukraintsiv [in Ukrainian].
Barsegian, I. A. (1981) O klassifikatcii form kulturnoi traditcii. Sovetskaia etnografiia. № 2. S. 102–103 [in Russian].
Bromlei, Iu. V. (1973) Etnos i etnografiia. Moskva. Nauka [in Russian].
Gumilev, L. (1972) Iskusstvo i etnos: Postanovka problemy. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo SSSR. № 1 (170). S. 36–41 [in Russian].
Gumilev, L. N. (1990) Geografiia etnosa v istoricheskii period. Leningrad. Nauka [in Russian].
Gumilev, L. N. (2004) Konetc i vnov nachalo: Populiarnye lektcii po narodovedeniiu. Moskva. AST [in Russian].
Kamenskii, A. A. (1980) Drevo traditcii. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo SSSR. Moskva, № 2. S. 14–17 [in Russian].
Koval’chuk, N. D. (2007) Symvolichni struktury etnokul’turnoho protsesu v Ukraini. Avtoref. dys. dokt. filos. nauk : 09.00.04. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kostenko, L. (2001) Humanitarna aura natsii, abo defekt holovnoho dzerkala. L’viv. LNU im. I. Franka [in Ukrainian].
Kryms’kyj, S. B. (2008) Pid syhnaturoiu. Kyiv. Kyievo-Mohylians’ka akademiia [in Ukrainian].
Maierchyk, M. (2015) U poshukakh sotsial’noi antropolohii v Ukraini. Mariia Maierchyk, Ihor Markov&Svitlana Odynets’. Narodoznavchi zoshyty. L’viv. IN NAN Ukrainy. № 6. S. 1257–1261 [in Ukrainian].
Makarian, E. S. (1981). O znachenii mezhdistciplinarnogo obsuzhdeniia problem kulturnoi traditcii. Sovetskaia etnografiia. № 3 (Mai–iiun). S. 59–71 [in Russian].
Makarian, E. S. (1981) Uzlovye problemy teorii kulturnoi traditcii. Sovetskaia etnografiia. № 2 (Mart–aprel). S. 78–96 [in Ukrainian].
Najden, O. S. (1989) Ornament ukrains’koho narodnoho rozpysu. Kyiv. Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Nekrasova, M. A. (1983) Narodnoe iskusstvo kak chast kultury. Teoriia i praktika. Moskva. Izobrazitelnoe iskusstvo [in Russian].
Pavliuk, S. P. (2006) Etnoheneza ukraintsiv: sproba teoretychnoi konstruktsii. L’viv. Natsional’na akademiia nauk Ukrainy. Instytut narodoznavstva [in Ukrainian].
Pavliuk, S. (2007) Superetnos (supernatsiia). Mala entsyklopediia ukrains’koho narodoznavstva. L’viv. Instytut narodoznavstva NAN Ukrainy. S. 580 [in Ukrainian].
Sokolov, E. V. (1981) Traditciia i kulturnaia preemstvennost. Sovetskaia etnografiia. № 3 (Mai–iiun). S. 56–59 [in Russian].
Stankevych, M. Ye. (2004) Avtentychnist’ mystetstva. Do postanovky pytannia. Avtentychnist’ mystetstva: Pytannia teorii plastychnykh mystetstv. Vybrani pratsi. L’viv. Spilka krytykiv ta istorykiv mystetstva. S. 171–180 [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych M. Ye. (2004) Evoliutsiia terminolohii etnomystetstvoznavstva. Avtentychnist’ mystetstva: Pytannia teorii plastychnykh mystetstv. Vybrani pratsi. L’viv. Spilka krytykiv ta istorykiv mystetstva. S. 99–110 [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych M. Ye. (2004) Mystetstvoznavchyj aspekt teorii tradytsii. Avtentychnist’ mystetstva: Pytannia teorii plastychnykh mystetstv. Vybrani pratsi. L’viv. Spilka krytykiv ta istorykiv mystetstva. S. 65–82 [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych M. Ye. (2004) Narodne mystetstvo i dyzajn: lohika osnovnykh rivniv formotvorennia. Avtentychnist’ mystetstva: Pytannia teorii plastychnykh mystetstv. Vybrani pratsi. L’viv. Spilka krytykiv ta istorykiv mystetstva. S. 111–118 [in Ukrainian].
Toffler, E. (2004). Shok budushchego. Per. s angl. E. Rudneva, L. Burmistrova, I. MoskvinaTarkhanova i dr. Moskva. ACT, 2004 [in Russian].
Fedorchuk, O. (2012). Biser u dekori tradytsijnoho odiahu ukraintsiv (pytannia typolohii).Narodoznavchi zoshyty. № 3 (105). S. 452–468 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorchuk, O. (2014). Biser u khudozhnij strukturi ansambliu bukovyns’koho narodnoho odiahu druhoi polovyny XX – pochatku XXI stolittia.Narodoznavchi zoshyty. № 6 (120). S. 1392–1402 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorchuk, O. (2016). Biserne ozdoblennia narodnoho odiahu hutsuliv XIX– pochatku XXI st.: typolohichni ta khudozhni osoblyvosti. Łemkowie, Bojkowie, Huculi, Rusini – historia, współczesność, kultura materialna i duchowa. Słupsk. T. VI. S. 377–395 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorchuk, O. (2015). Biserni komponenty zakhidnopodil’s’koho odiahu XIX stolittia.Narodoznavchi zoshyty. № 4. S. 841–849 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorchuk, O. (2017). Mystets’ka tradytsiia bisernoho ozdoblennia narodnoi noshi Pokuttia. Narodoznavchi zoshyty. № 1. S. 188–202 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorchuk, O. (2013). Typolohichni ta khudozhni osoblyvosti bisernoho dekoru bukovyns’koho narodnoho odiahu XIX stolittia. Narodoznavchi zoshyty. № 6 (114). S. 1080–1086 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorchuk, O. (2007). Ukrains’ki narodni prykrasy z biseru. Vidpov. red. M. Stankevych. L’viv : IN NANU ; Svichado [in Ukrainian].
Fedorchuk, O. (2012). Ukrains’ki narodni khudozhni vyroby z biseru: retrospektyva ta suchasni tendentsii. Mystetstvoznavstvo: Naukovyj zbirnyk. L’viv. SKIM. S. 103–112 [in Ukrainian].
Fedorchuk, O. (2012). Universal’ni ta unikal’ni rysy bisernoho dekoru narodnoho odiahu ukraintsiv. Mystetstvoznavstvo: Naukovyj zbirnyk. L’viv : SKIM. S. 155–168 [in Ukrainian].
Anokhina, V. V. (2010). Kulturnaia traditciia v kontekste sovremennoi sotcialnoi dinamiki. Humanitarnyj visnyk ZDIA. Vyp. 42. S. 89–101 Retrieved from: http://www.zgia.zp.ua/gazeta/visnik_42_10.pdf (data zvernennia: 05.03.2017) [in Russian].
Bondarenko, O. V. (2008). Ukrains’ka mental’nist’ v rozmaitti natsional’nykh mental’nykh formoutvoren’ j arkhetypiv: istorykokul’turnyj aspekt. Humanitarnyj visnyk ZDIA. Filosofiia. Zaporizhzhia. Vyp. 32. S. 66–78. Retrieved from: http://www.zgia.zp.ua/gazeta/visnik_32_66.pdf (data zvernennia: 05.03.2017) [in Ukrainian].
Varlamov, D. I. (2007). Ontologiia khudozhestvennykh traditcii. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. Gumanitarnye nauki: teoriia i metodologiia. № 4.S. 114–119. Retrieved from: http://www.zpu¬journal.ru/zpu/2007_4/Varlamov/22.pdf (data zvernennia: 05.03.2017) [in Russian].
Gumilev, L. N. Etnicheskie protcessy: dva podkhoda k izucheniiu. S. 50–57. Retrieved from: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/666/052/1217/005.GUMILEV.pdf (data zvernennia: 05.03.2017) [in Russian].
Pasionarii. Retrieved from: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasionarii (data zvernennia: 05.03.2017) [in Ukrainian].

Read»

Our authors
Daily bread baking of ukrainians in the south-western ethnographical region at the late XIX to early XXI cc.
The paper has dealt with analytic study in prescriptions, signs, customs, methods, ways of selection, procurement and some peculiarities in usage of subsidiary means — water, firewood and leaves in bread baking. The final aim of the mentioned actions had been (and still is) selection of the means and ingredients fit, by their characteristics, for the backing of bread. The paper has demonstrated dependence of bread backing subsi­diary means criteria from the folk nutritional standards and world outlook stereotypes as well as from regional social and economic, natural and geographical factors and peculiarities of material culture.
Read »

Traditional folk clothes of velikobychkovsky hutsuly of XIX — the first half of XX century
In the study based upon numerous field materials, literature sources as well as ethnographic, historio-cultural and regional museum collections has been performed complex analysis in traditional folk clothes by Hutzul population of Velyky Bychkiv village in Transcarpathian region. Detailed descriptions of femi­nine and masculine clothing complexes of the mentioned area have been presented. In characterizing of those main attention has been paid to the detail of cut in separate components of dress; cut of feminine shirt has been added as an illustration.
Read »

Boikos’ pandemonium: categories of evil deceased
In the article have been presented some research-work on peculiarities of Boikos’ traditional demonological notions as for so-called evil deceased; on the basis of field records and ethnological literary sources quite a number of scum categories have been defined as well as essential habits, modes of behavior and functions of these personages of people’s demonology.
Read »

On bessarabian and moldavian ukrainians in the studies of historical ethnography
The article has thrown some light upon a sum of scientific findings got during XIX to XXI cc. in historio-ethnographic studies of Bessarabia and Moldavian Ukrainians. In the pre­sent paper has been given author’s answer to the problem of lacking progress as for the numerous themes concerning Ukrainians. State and achievements of the research-works in Ukrainians’ material and spiritual culture by the scientists of Moldavia and Ukraine through the years of independence has been exposed.
Read »