Archive
2012 year, issue 3 read »
The Ethnology Notebooks. 2024. # 6 (180). P. 1365- DOI... read »
«The Ethnology Notebooks» 2020 year, issue 2 read »
«Narodoznavchi Zoshyty» 2016 year, issue 5 read »

« 2017. #4 (136)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2017, 4 (136), 784–791

UDK 94(477.85/.87). «1938/1939»

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2017.04.784

THE INFLUENCE OF CARPATHIAN UKRAINE ON POLITICAL SITUATION AT GALICIAN HUTSULSHCHYNA (On the occasion of 80-th anniversary of Carpathian Ukraine proclamation)

Siredchuk Petro Stepanovyh — doctor of historical sciences, professor

Departments of history of slavs Prykarpattya national

to the university of the name of Vasyl Stefanyk

str. Shevchenko, 57, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76000, Ukraine

Contacts: tel. 0342231574

Abstract. It is considering the course of political events, connected with Carpathian Ukraine, at the period from October, 11 1938 to the edge of April 1939. The author highlights different facts of comprehensive support of the process of formation of Transcarpathia Ukrainians statehood by the Galician Hutsulshchyna dwellers. Besides this, the author reveals the Polish state repressive measures against Galician hutsuls coursed to avoid radicalization of their disposition and national resistance movements rising for autonomy and appearance of new Ukrainian statehood at the Western Ukrainian lands, including the territory of Galician Hutsulshchyna.

Keywords: Carpathian Ukraine, Galician hutsuls, Greek Catholic clergy, Polish authority, secret agents, repressions.

Received 10.07.2017

REFERENCES

DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2121. Ark. 18 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO.F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2121. Ark. 120–123 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 107 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 109 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 151 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 159 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 175 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 178 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 179 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 179 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1.Spr. 2328. Ark. 181 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 187 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 194 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 194 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328.Ark. 195 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 195 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2328. Ark. 196 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 11–11zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 12 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 24 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO.F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 343. Ark. 25 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 32 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 32 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 33 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343.Ark. 33 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 45 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 46 zv. [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 59 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 62 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 72 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343. Ark. 76 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 2. Op. 1. Spr. 2343.Ark. 78 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 226. Op. 1. Spr. 760. Ark. 2 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 226. Op. 1. Spr. 761. Ark. 2 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 226. Op. 1. Spr. 793. Ark. 1 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 226. Op. 1. Spr. 793. Ark. 2 [in Ukrainian].
DAIFO. F. 226.Op. 1. Spr. 793. Ark. 3 [in Ukrainian].
TsDIA Ukrainy, m. L’viv. F. 179. Op. 5. Spr. 65. Ark. 1 [in Ukrainian].
TsDIA Ukrainy, m. L’viv. F. 179. Op. 5. Spr. 65. Ark. 2 [in Ukrainian].
TsDIA Ukrainy, m. L’viv. F. 179. Op. 5. Spr. 65. Ark. 3 [in Ukrainian].
TsDIA Ukrainy, m. L’viv. F. 214. Op. 1. Spr. 1376. Ark. 6–7 [in Ukrainian].
TsDIA Ukrainy, m. L’viv. F. 214. Op. 1.Spr. 1404. Ark. 31 [in Ukrainian].
TsDIA Ukrainy, m. L’viv. F. 214. Op. 1. Spr. 1405. Ark. 9 [in Ukrainian].
Handziuk, R. (1999). Nadvirna. Istorychnyj narys. Vid najdavnishykh chasiv do nashykh dniv. Ivano-Frankivs’k: Siversiia [in Ukrainian].
Lukaniuk, O. (2017). Roztoky. Istorychnyj narys vid najdavnishykh chasiv do 2016 roku Bozhoho. Kosiv: Pysanyj Kamin’ [in Ukrainian].
Maslianyk, O. (2016). Hutsul’s’ka respublika i Karpats’ka Ukraina v konteksti natsional’novyzvol’nykh zmahan’ ukrains’koho narodu. Hutsul’schyna v plyni vikiv: istoriia i kul’tura: Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovopraktychnoi konferentsii. Z nahody 25-richchia tovarystva Hutsul’schyna u L’vovi. L’viv, 30 sichnia 2016 r. L’viv: Liha-Pres [in Ukrainian].
Siredzhuk, P. (2011). Diial’nist’ «Prosvity» u Mykulychyni. Mykulychyn.Vyp. 2. Ivano-Frankivs’k: Foliant [in Ukrainian].
Rzemieniuk, F.(2004). Stosunek greckokatolickiego duchowieństwa do państwa polskiego II Rzeczypospolitej (1918–1939).. Rocznik historyczno-archiwalny. Przemyśl. T. XVIII. S. 189–279 [in Polish]..
Rzemieniuk, F.(2003). Walki polityczne greckokatolickie goduchowieństwa o niepodłeglość Ukrainy w okresie II Rzeczy pospolitej (1918–1939). Siedlce [in Polish].

Read»

Our authors
Olena Nykorak. Senior Researcher, Doctor of Arts read »
Olena Fedorchuk. Senior Research Fellow, Ph.D. read »
Stepan Pavluk. Prof., full member of NAS of Ukraine,... read »
Oksana Kis. Senior scientific employee, candidate of... read »
Daily bread baking of ukrainians in the south-western ethnographical region at the late XIX to early XXI cc.
The paper has dealt with analytic study in prescriptions, signs, customs, methods, ways of selection, procurement and some peculiarities in usage of subsidiary means — water, firewood and leaves in bread baking. The final aim of the mentioned actions had been (and still is) selection of the means and ingredients fit, by their characteristics, for the backing of bread. The paper has demonstrated dependence of bread backing subsi­diary means criteria from the folk nutritional standards and world outlook stereotypes as well as from regional social and economic, natural and geographical factors and peculiarities of material culture.
Read »

Boikos’ pandemonium: categories of evil deceased
In the article have been presented some research-work on peculiarities of Boikos’ traditional demonological notions as for so-called evil deceased; on the basis of field records and ethnological literary sources quite a number of scum categories have been defined as well as essential habits, modes of behavior and functions of these personages of people’s demonology.
Read »

On bessarabian and moldavian ukrainians in the studies of historical ethnography
The article has thrown some light upon a sum of scientific findings got during XIX to XXI cc. in historio-ethnographic studies of Bessarabia and Moldavian Ukrainians. In the pre­sent paper has been given author’s answer to the problem of lacking progress as for the numerous themes concerning Ukrainians. State and achievements of the research-works in Ukrainians’ material and spiritual culture by the scientists of Moldavia and Ukraine through the years of independence has been exposed.
Read »

On field exploration of russian and belarusian ethnologists and etnolinguists in Ukrainian Polisia 1945—1980s
In the study based on a wide range of literary materials have been comprehensively characterised field research in Polisia of Ukraine, performed by Russian and Belarusian ethnologists during 1945—1980s as well as Moscow ethnolinguists and other researchers from ethnologic centres of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus in the course of realization of Ethnolinguistic Atlas of Polisia program. Particular attention has been paid to geography, methods, themes and research results of scientific projects.
Read »