Archive
«Narodoznavchi Zoshyty» 2016 year, issue 1 read »
«The Ethnology Notebooks» 2018 year, issue 6 read »
The Ethnology Notebooks. 2021. #3 (159). P. 503–??? DOI... read »
«Narodoznavchi Zoshyty» 2016 year, issue 3 read »

« 2018. #3 (141)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2018, 3 (141), 683–688

UDK 392.81 — 055.2 «18/19»

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2018.03.683

ANTHROPOMORPHY OF CLAY OVENS AND UTENSILSIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TRADITIONAL WORLD OF THE UKRAINIAN PEASANTRY OF THE DNIEPER (1870S — EARLY 1930S)

Shcherban Olena Vasylivna, candidate of sciences in hiatory, senior lecturer
of the Department of History
of Ukraine and World History of Kharkiv State Academy of Ars.
Bursatskyii Uzviz Street 4, 61003, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Contacts: Tel (066)1845061

Abstrakt. The data on the irrational conceptions of the peasants of the Dnieper to the clay crockery and viable ovens in the context of the popular culture of nutrition have been analyzed. Their appearance is due to the anthropomorphy of clay crockery and domestic cooker furnace.

Keywords: archetypism, culture of food, clay dishes, oven, woman, anthropomorphism, Naddnipryanshchyna.

Received 23.02.2018

References

Bajburin, A.K. (1993). Ritual v tradicionnoj kul’ture: Strukturno-semanticheskij analiz vostochnoslavjanskih obrjadov. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka [in Russian].
Bobrinskij, A. (1993). O dvuh simvolah plodorodija na ukrainskoj keramike. In Ukraїns’ke goncharstvo: nac. kul’turol. shhorіchnik: nauk. zb. za minulі lіta. (Kn. 1, pp. 120—135). Kyiv; Opіshne [in Russian].
Boltarovych, Z.Ye. (1990). Narodna medytsyna ukraintsiv. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Boriak, Olena. (2009). Baba-povytukha v kul’turno-istorychnij tradytsii ukraintsiv: mizh profannym i sakral’nym. Kyiv: In-t mystetstvoznav., fol’klorystyky ta etnolohii im. M.T. Ryl’s’koho [in Ukrainian].
Vasilenko, V.I. (1902). Opyt tolkovogo slovarja narodnoj tehnicheskoj terminologii po Poltavskoj gubernii. Otdel І-j, ІІ-j i ІІІ-j. Kustarnye promysly, sel’skoe hozjajstvo i zemlevedenie, narodnye pogovorki i izrechenija. In Trudy Har’kovskogo predvaritel’nogo komiteta po ustrojstvu HІІ Arheologicheskogo sezda. (Vol. T. ІІ, pp. 139—216). Har’kov: Pechatnoe delo [in Russian].
H[rushevs’kyj], M. (1914). Z zhyttia selian na Chyhyrynschyni. Ukrains’kyj etnohrafichnyj zbirnyk. (Vol. 1, pp. 29—51). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Hlushko, M. (2017). Malovidome doslidzhennia Marka Hrushevs’koho. Narodoznavchi zoshyty, 3 (135), 531—540 [in Ukrainian].
Hrushevs’ka, Kateryna. (1927). Z prymityvnoho hospodarstva. Kil’ka zavvazhen’ pro zasoby zhinochoi hospodars’koi mahii u zv’iazku z najstarshymy formamy zhinochoho hospodarstva. In Pervisne hromadianstvo ta joho perezhytky na Ukraini za 1927 r. (pp. 9—44). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Hrushevs’kyj, M. (2002). Z zhyttia selian na Chyhyrynschyni. Pam’iatky Ukrainy: istoriia i kul’tura, 2, 127—135 [in Ukrainian].
Zahlada, N. (1931). Kharchuvannia v s. Starosillia na Chernihivschyni. Materyialy do etnolohii. (Issue 3, pp. 83—196). Kyiv: Vseukr. akad. nauk [in Ukrainian].
I[vanov], P. (1889). Narodnye obychai, pover’ja, primety, poslovicy i zagadki, otnosjashhiesja k malorusskoj hate: (Materialy dlja harakteristiki mirosozercanija krest’janskogo naselenija Kupjanskogo uezda). In Har’kovskij Sbornik. Literaturno-nauchnoe prilozhenie k «Har’kovskomu kalendarju» na 1889 god. (Issue 3, pp. 35—66). Har’kov: Tipografija Gubernskogo Pravlenija [in Russian].
Maierchyk, Mariia. (2011). Rytual i tilo. Strukturno-semantychnyj analiz ukrains’kykh obriadiv rodynnoho tsyklu. Kyiv: Krytyka [in Ukrainian].
Mazalova, N.E. (1999). Chelovek i dom: tozhdestvo russkih predstavlenij. Zhenshhina i veshhestvennyj mir kul’tury u narodov Rossii i Evropy. (Sbornik MAJe, Vol. XLVII, pp. 101—110). Sankt-Peterburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie [in Russian].
Poshyvajlo, O. (1993). Etnohrafiia ukrains’koho honcharstva: Livoberezhna Ukraina. Kyiv: Molod’ [in Ukrainian].
Rakhno, Kostiantyn. (2011). Kupivlia molochnoho posudu iak vyiav zhinochoi hospodars’koi mahii. Etnichna istoriia narodiv Yevropy: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’. Issue 34, 84—88. Kyiv: Kyivs’kyj natsional’nyj universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka [in Ukrainian].
Rakhno, Kostiantyn. (2012). Perunove polum’ia. Mifolohiia ta obriadovist’ slov’ians’kykh honchariv. Poltava: ASMI [in Ukrainian].
Syvak, V. (2007). Pich khatnia. In Mala entsyklopediia ukrains’koho narodoznavstva. (pp. 457—459). L’viv: In-t narodoznavstva NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Spas’ka, Ye. (1929). Hlechyk z khrestykom: (etiud z tsyklu «Chernihivs’ke honcharstvo»). In Materialy do etnolohii j antropolohii. (Vol. 21/22. Ch. 1, pp. 35—41). L’viv: Druk. Nauk. t-va im. Shevchenka [in Ukrainian].
Sreznevskij, I.I. (1958). Slovar’ drevnerusskogo jazyka s istoricheskimi dopolnenijami. Vosproizv. reproduktivno fotomehanicheskim sposobom po izdaniju 1893 g. Moskva: GIS [in Russian].
Sumcov, N.F. (1902). Ocherki narodnogo byta (iz jetnograficheskoj jekskursii 1901 g. po Ahtyrskomu uezdu Har’kovskoj gubernii). Har’kov: Pechatnoe delo [in Russian].
Toporov, V.N. (1971). O rituale. Vvedenie v problematiku. In Arhaicheskij ritual v fol’klornyh i ranneliteraturnyh pamjatnikah. (pp. 7—60). Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].
Fasmer, M. (1971). Jetimologicheskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka: per. s nem. (Vol. 3). Moskva: Progress [in Russian].
Chubinskij, P.P. (1872). Trudy jetnografichesko-statisticheskoj jekspedicii v Zapadno-Russkij kraj, snarjazhennoj Imperatorskim russkim geograficheskim obshhestvom. Jugo-Zapadnyj otdel. (Vol. 1). Sankt-Peterburg: Tip. V. Bezobrazova [in Russian].
Shevchenko, L. (1926). Zvychai, zv’iazani z zakladynamy budivli. In Pervisne hromadianstvo ta joho perezhytky na Ukraini. (Vol. 1—2, pp. 87—95). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Shejko, V.M. (2001). Istoryko-kul’turolohichni aspekty psykhoanalizu. Kharkiv: Osnova [in Ukrainian].
Shul’hina, L. (1929). Hancharstvo v s. Bubnivtsi na Podilli. Materiialy do etnolohii. (Vol. 2, pp. 111—200). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Shurc, G. (2010). Osnovy kul’tury. Obshhestvo. Hozjajstvo. In Istorija pervobytnoj kul’tury. (Vol. 1). Moskva: KRASAND [in Russian].
Shh[elokovskaja], V[arvara]. (1899). Pishha i pit’e krest’jan-malorossov, s nekotorymi otnosjashhimisja sjuda obychajami, pover’jami i primetami. Jetnograficheskoe obozrenie, 1—2, 266—322. Moskva: Izdanie Jetnograficheskogo Otdela Imperatorskogo obshhestva ljubitelej estestvoznanija, antropologii i jetnografii, sostojashhego pri Moskovskom universitete [in Russian].
Shhepanskaja, T.B. (1999). Pronimal’naja simvolika. In Zhenshhina i veshhestvennyj mir kul’tury u narodov Rossii i Evropy. (Sbornik MAJe, Vol. XLVII, pp. 149—199). Sankt-Peterburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie [in Russian].
Scherban’, A.L. (2017). Transformatsii ornamentuvannia keramiky v tradytsijnij kul’turi Livoberezhnoi Ukrainy (kinets’ VII tys. do n. e. — XIX stolittia). Kharkiv: Vydavets’ Oleksandr Savchuk [in Ukrainian].
Scherban’, O. (2014). Hlynianyj posud v kul’turi kharchuvannia ukraintsiv kintsia 1860-h — pochatku 1870-h rokiv (za materialamy, zibranymy Pavlom Chubyns’kym). In VІІ Kirillo-Mefodievskie chtenija: v 2 ch.: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Ch. 1, pp.101—105), Ufa [in Ukrainian].
Scherban’, O. (2016). Hlynianyj posud Naddniprianschyny i tekhnolohiia pryhotuvannia strav u varystij pechi (XIX—XX stolittia). Naukovi Zoshyty istorychnoho fakul’tetu L’vivs’koho natsional’noho universytetu: zb. nauk. pr., Issue. 17, 124—134 [in Ukrainian].
Scherban’, O. (2008). Hlynianyj posud u vesil’nij obriadovosti Poltavschyny, In Tradytsijna kul’tura v umovakh hlobalizatsii: problema zberezhennia i onovlennia etnichno-kul’turnoi spadschyny: materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., 27—28 serp. 2008 r. (pp. 105—110). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Jevola, Julius. (1996). Metafizika pola. Moskva: Belovod’e [in Russian].
Jung, K.G. (2010). Psihologija bessoznatel’nogo. Moskva: Kogito-Centr [in Russian].

Read»

Our authors
Oksana Sapeliak. Senior Research Fellow, Ph.D. in... read »
Roman Radovych. Researcher, Ph.D. in History. read »
Kuzmenko Oksana Senior Researcher, Candidate of... read »
Olena Nykorak. Senior Researcher, Doctor of Arts read »
Boikos’ pandemonium: categories of evil deceased
In the article have been presented some research-work on peculiarities of Boikos’ traditional demonological notions as for so-called evil deceased; on the basis of field records and ethnological literary sources quite a number of scum categories have been defined as well as essential habits, modes of behavior and functions of these personages of people’s demonology.
Read »

Maternity ritualism by volhynians in publications of the second half XIX to the early XXI cc.
In the article have been considered some basic landmarks for fixing and publication of ethnographic materials on the maternity rites of Volhynia with analytical study in ritual elements, their kinds and territories of origin. The article has also raised a problem of gaps in studies of maternity rites of Ukrainian historio-ethnographic Volhynia.
Read »

Daily bread baking of ukrainians in the south-western ethnographical region at the late XIX to early XXI cc.
The paper has dealt with analytic study in prescriptions, signs, customs, methods, ways of selection, procurement and some peculiarities in usage of subsidiary means — water, firewood and leaves in bread baking. The final aim of the mentioned actions had been (and still is) selection of the means and ingredients fit, by their characteristics, for the backing of bread. The paper has demonstrated dependence of bread backing subsi­diary means criteria from the folk nutritional standards and world outlook stereotypes as well as from regional social and economic, natural and geographical factors and peculiarities of material culture.
Read »

Traditional folk clothes of velikobychkovsky hutsuly of XIX — the first half of XX century
In the study based upon numerous field materials, literature sources as well as ethnographic, historio-cultural and regional museum collections has been performed complex analysis in traditional folk clothes by Hutzul population of Velyky Bychkiv village in Transcarpathian region. Detailed descriptions of femi­nine and masculine clothing complexes of the mentioned area have been presented. In characterizing of those main attention has been paid to the detail of cut in separate components of dress; cut of feminine shirt has been added as an illustration.
Read »