« 2026. # 2 (188)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2026. № 2 (188), 313—325

UDK 94(477)-028.16:355.01(470+571-651.1)”20″(09):303.446.4

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/

  • Received: 01.03.2026
  • Accepted: 10.03.2026
  • Published: ??.??.2026

BETWEEN DOCUMENTATION AND INTERPRETATION:  ORAL HISTORY IN UKRAINE DURING THE WAR

BODNAR Halyna

  • ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7972-8111
  • Candidate of History, Associate Professor,
  • Ivan Franko National University of Lviv,
  • Mykhailo Hrushevsky Chair 
  • of Contemporary History of Ukraine,
  • 1, Universytetska Str., 79000, Lviv, Ukraine,
  • Contacts: e-mail: halyna.bod@gmail.com

Abstract. Introduction. Oral history in Ukraine has undergone significant transformations since the Revolution of Dignity and the start of the Russian-Ukrainian war in 2014. The full-scale Russian invasion in 2022 sharply intensified the documentation of wartime experiences. Ukrainian oral history has strengthened its presence in international academic discourse. At the same time, a unique approach to documenting «unfinished history» is emerging, which differs from established global practices for researching crisis events. Therefore, analyzing the current development of Ukrainian oral history studies is a pressing task for historical and interdisciplinary research and has practical significance for the further collection, archiving, and use of oral testimonies of the war.

The purpose of this article is to outline the main trends in the development of oral history in Ukraine after 2014, taking into account the sharp increase in the scale of documentation after 2022, as well as to identify key problems and possible directions for further development. The article examines the state of Ukrainian oral history before the changes of the mid-2010s, the challenges associated with documenting the events of the Revolution of Dignity and the war, as well as contemporary methodological and ethical issues. Special attention is paid to positive developments, problematic aspects and new challenges facing Ukrainian oral history of the war.

The methodological basis of the study consists of historiographical and comparative analysis, a problem-chronological approach, and qualitative content analysis of professional discussions and publications. An analytical-synthetic method and an interdisciplinary approach were used to summarise the results.

Conclusion. During the full-scale war, the personal experiences of Ukrainian scholars combined with an intensified sense of professional responsibility. This situation led to a rethinking of ethical and methodological approaches to recording interviews. An important result of documenting war testimonies is the strengthening of Ukrainian oral history’s participation in international scientific discourse and its entry into a new stage of development. At the same time, Ukrainian oral history of the war faces problems that are only beginning to be systematically addressed. After an intensive phase of field collection of oral testimonies of the war, issues of their proper archiving and analysis are becoming increasingly relevant. Some oral history collections are transferred abroad for security reasons, which raises the issue of Ukraine’s archival sovereignty. Ukrainian oral history is also increasingly moving beyond the academic sphere and becoming an important component of community archiving.

Keywords: oral history in Ukraine, Russian-Ukrainian war, documentation, oral history archive, analysis of oral testimonies.

REFERENCES

  • Grinchenko, G., Rebrova, I., & Romanova, I. (2012). Oral history in post-Soviet research practices (on the example of contemporary Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine). Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal, 4, 172—187 [in Ukrainian].
  • Kis, O. (2017, January 15). Oral history in contemporary Ukraine: Achievements and challenges of the time. Heinrich Boell Foundation. Retrieved from: https://ua.boell.org/uk/2017/01/16/usna-istoriya-v-suchasniy-ukrayini-zdobutki-i-vikliki-chasu (Last accessed: 17.02.2026) [in Ukrainian].
  • Grinchenko, G. (Ed.). (2021). Questions, narratives, interpretations: Oral history as an art of balance and interaction. Listening, hearing, understanding: Oral history of Ukraine in the 20th—21st centuries (Pp. 15—27). Kyiv: ART KNYHA LLC [in Ukrainian].
  • Otrishchenko, N. (Ed.). (2024). Conversations with those who ask about the war. Center for Urban History [in Ukrainian].
  • Khanenko-Friesen, N., & Skubytska, Yu. (2024, November 12). Historians and war: (Oral) history, historical politics, and the decolonization of East European studies. Ukraina Moderna. Retrieved from: https://uamoderna.com/war/istoryky-i-vijna-usna-istoriya-istorychna-polityka-i-dekolonizacziya-shidnoyevropejskyh-studij/ (Last accessed: 17.02.2026) [in Ukrainian].
  • Grinchenko, G. (2022, August 25). Oral history of war: Questions and cautions regarding the research method. Heinrich Boell Foundation. Retrieved from: https://ua.boell.org/uk/2022/08/25/usna-istoriya-viyny-pytannya-i-zasterezhennya-shchodo-metodu-doslidzhennya (Last accessed: 17.02.2026) [in Ukrainian].
  • Bodnar, H. (2023). Oral history of revolution, war, and volunteerism in Ukraine: How to work with the unfinished past. Ukraine-Poland: Historical Heritage and Public Consciousness, 16, 268—300 [in Ukrainian].
  • Bodnar, H., Grinchenko, G. (Ed.). (2021). «Today history is being made in Ukraine». Oral history and the experiences of unfinished revolution and war: Reflections on the debatable and the (non)obvious. In: Grinchenko, G. Listening, hearing, understanding: Oral history of Ukraine in the 20th—21st centuries (Pp. 31—57). Kyiv: ART KNYHA LLC [in Ukrainian].
  • Pechersky, A. (2023, October 18). Oral history of an unfinished war is primarily a matter of ethics and methodology — Gelinada Grinchenko [Interview]. Armiya Inform. Retrieved from: https://armyinform.com.ua/2023/10/18/usna-istoriya-nezavershenoyi-vijny-cze-nasampered-pytannya-etyky-j-metodologiyi-gelinada-grinchenko/ (Last accessed: 18.02.2026) [in Ukrainian].
  • Khanenko-Friesen, N., & Grinchenko, G. (2025, February 20). Ukrainian oral history in dialogue with the world: Observations from the wartime period (2024). Ukraina Moderna. Retrieved from: https://uamoderna.com/war/ukrayinska-usna-istoriya-u-dialozi-zi-svitom-sposterezhennya-voyennoyi-doby-2024/ (Last accessed: 15.02.2026) [in Ukrainian].
  • Khanenko-Friesen, N. (2024, May 2). Testimonies of war: From oral history to the national documentary heritage. Ukraina Moderna. Retrieved from: https://uamoderna.com/notes/svidchennya-vijny-vid-usnoyi-istoriyi-do-naczionalnoyi-dokumentalnoyi-spadshhyny/ (Last accessed: 15.02.2026) [in Ukrainian].
  • Khanenko-Friesen, N. (2025, October 8). Archival sovereignty: Ukrainian archeographic data and the challenges of the wartime period. Ukraina Moderna. Retrieved from: https://uamoderna.com/war/arkhivnyi-suverenitet-zniaty-lapky-ukrainski-arkheografichni-dani-ta-vyklyky-voiennoi-doby/ (Last accessed: 16.02.2026) [in Ukrainian].
  • Kis, O. (2007). Oral History: Formation, Issues, Methodological Foundations. Ukraina moderna, 11 (Oral history), 7—21 [in Ukrainian].
  • Thomson, A., Kravchenko, V., & Grinchenko, G. (Eds.). (2008). Four paradigm shifts in oral history. In: V. Kravchenko, G. Grinchenko. East-West: Historical and cultural studies. Oral history in social and humanitarian studies: Theory and research practice (Issue 11—12, pp. 7—24). Kharkiv: NTMТ LLC [in Ukrainian].
  • Filipkowski, P. (2015). Oral History as Factual History, or How to «De-anthropologize» Stories about the Past? Anthropology of History Yearbook, 8 (Anthropology and history), 91—108 [in Polish].
  • Noll, V. (1999). Transformation of civil society: Oral history of Ukrainian peasant culture, 1920—1930. Kyiv: Center for Oral History and Culture Studies «Rodovid» [in Ukrainian].
  • Kis, O. (2014, November 11). From a twenty-year distance: Reflections on oral history conferences in 1994 and 2014. Ukraina Moderna. Retrieved from: https://uamoderna.com/event/z-vidstani-20-rokiv/ (Last accessed: 18.02. 2026) [in Ukrainian].
  • Clark, M.M., Bearman, P., Ellis, C.C., & Drury Smith, S. (Eds.). (2011). After the fall: New Yorkers remember September 2001 and the years that followed. New York: The New Press.
  • Sloan, S. (2008). Oral history and Hurricane Katrina: Reflections on shouts and silences. The Oral History Review, 35 (2), 176—186.
  • Leydesdorff, S. (2011). Surviving the Bosnian genocide: The women of Srebrenica speak. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Petril, A., & Hasanović, H. (2020). Voices from Srebrenica: Survivor narratives of the Bosnian genocide. NC: McFarland.
  • Jessee, E. (2017). Negotiating genocide in Rwanda: The politics of history. New York City, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Saber, D., & al-Jaloud, A.R. (2024). The Syrian Archive Digital Memory Project: Archiving as testimony, as evidence, as creative practice. Visual Anthropology, 37, 19—34.
  • Cave, M., & Sloan, S.M. (Eds.). (2014). Listening on the edge: Oral history in the aftermath of crisis. Oxford University Press.
  • Sloan, S.M. (2020). Behind the «curve»: COVID-19, infodemic, and oral history. The Oral History Review, 47 (2), 193—202.
  • Cramer, J.A. (2020). «First, do no harm»: Tread carefully where oral history, trauma, and current crises intersect. The Oral History Review, 47 (2), 203—213.
  • Morgan, C., Perks, R., Stewart, M., & Johnston, C. (2021, February 8). Advice on remote oral history interviewing during the Covid-19 pandemic. Oral History Society. Retrieved from: https://www.ohs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Advice-on-remote-interviewing-during-the-Covid-19-Pandemic-v.70D0A-FINAL.pdf (Last accessed: 16.02.2026).
  • Sielaff, S., Sloan, S.M., Cain Darough, A. A., & Holland, M. (2024). Oral history at a distance. Routledge Press.
  • Rosenthal, G. (Ed.). (2022). Introduction. Transnational biographies: Changing we-images, collective belongings and power chances of migrants and refugees (Pp. 7—15). Universitatsverlag Gottingen.
  • Doboshevska, A. (Ed.). (2025). How to preserve memory? A guide to community archiving. Kyiv; Lviv [in Ukrainian].
  • Bodnar, H. (2026). Community archives: Grassroots cultural heritage preservation practices. Arkhivy Ukrayiny. [forthcoming] [in Ukrainian].
  • Grinchenko, G., Rebrova, I., & Romanova, I. (2014, October 30). Oral history in post-Soviet research practices. Ukraina Moderna. Retrieved from: https://uamoderna.com/md/grinchenko-rebrova-romanova-oh/ (Last accessed: 18.02.2026) [in Ukrainian].Bodnar, H. (2024). Narrative representations of the Russian war in Ukraine in oral histories of Ukrainian soldiers about 2014—2015. TheEthnology Notebooks, 6 (180), 1753—1764. DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2024.06.1753 [in Ukrainian].
Our authors
Boikos’ pandemonium: categories of evil deceased
In the article have been presented some research-work on peculiarities of Boikos’ traditional demonological notions as for so-called evil deceased; on the basis of field records and ethnological literary sources quite a number of scum categories have been defined as well as essential habits, modes of behavior and functions of these personages of people’s demonology.
Read »

On field exploration of russian and belarusian ethnologists and etnolinguists in Ukrainian Polisia 1945—1980s
In the study based on a wide range of literary materials have been comprehensively characterised field research in Polisia of Ukraine, performed by Russian and Belarusian ethnologists during 1945—1980s as well as Moscow ethnolinguists and other researchers from ethnologic centres of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus in the course of realization of Ethnolinguistic Atlas of Polisia program. Particular attention has been paid to geography, methods, themes and research results of scientific projects.
Read »

Wax candle as ukrainian Christmas and epiphany ritualistic text
For the first time in native ethnology the article has brought some results of special study in sign functionality of a wax candle under the context of Ukrainian Christmas and Epiphany ritualistic text (ritualism of Christmas Eve, New Year, Epiphany Eve and Feast of Epiphany). The study has stated extremely high semiotic position of a wax candle as projection of Sun, mediator between the spheres of sacral and prophane elements, symbolic analogue of human existence, apotropy, cultural symbol re-establishing borders of acculturated space.
Read »

Traditional folk clothes of velikobychkovsky hutsuly of XIX — the first half of XX century
In the study based upon numerous field materials, literature sources as well as ethnographic, historio-cultural and regional museum collections has been performed complex analysis in traditional folk clothes by Hutzul population of Velyky Bychkiv village in Transcarpathian region. Detailed descriptions of femi­nine and masculine clothing complexes of the mentioned area have been presented. In characterizing of those main attention has been paid to the detail of cut in separate components of dress; cut of feminine shirt has been added as an illustration.
Read »