Archive

« 2018. #2 (140)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2018, 2 (140), 310—318.

UDK 745/749.072.2Станкевич

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2018.02.310

Received 6.02.2018

MYKHAILO STANKEVYCH — THE RESEARCHER OF DECORATIVE ART THEORY

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-8929

Nykorak Olena, doctor in Art Studies, professor, research fellow

Folk Art Department

of the Institute of Ethnology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

Svobody Avenue 15, 79000, Lviv, Ukraine.

Contacts: e-mail: olenanykorak@gmail.com

Abstrakt. The scientific achievements of an outstanding Ukrainian scientist Mykhailo Stankevych are analyzed. The main attention is paid to his works. An art critique of the most significant theoretical achievements of the author in the field of decorative art is given.

Keywords: Mykhailo Stankevych, theory of decorative art, ethnoesthetics, morphology, typology, tradition and innovation, stylistics and semantics.

REFERENCES

Antonovych, Ye. (1993). Dekoratyvno-prykladne mystetstvo.  L’viv: Svit [in Ukrainian].
Bodnar, O. (2004). [Rets. na zbirnyk. M. Stankevych Avtentychnist’ mystetstva. Pytannia teorii plastychnykh mystetstv. Vybrani pratsi. L’viv: SKIM]. Mystetstvoznavstvo’04, 197—198.   L’viv: Spilka krytykiv ta istorykiv mystetstva [in Ukrainian].
Herus, L. (2008). 60-richnyj iuvilej Mykhajla Stankevycha. Mystetstvoznavstvo’08,   246—247. L’viv: Spilka krytykiv ta istorykiv mystetstva [in Ukrainian].
Herus, L. (2017). Viddil narodnoho mystetstva: 25-littia di¬ial’nosti. Narodoznavchi zoshyty, 5, 1003—1018 [in Ukrainian].
Makohin, H.V., Lotots’ka V.M., Strebkova I.V. & Stankevych M.Ye. (Ed.). (2015). Kafedra dyzajnu i teorii mystetstva : bibliohrafichnyj pokazhchyk. Ivano-Frankivs’k: Foliant [in Ukrainian].
Mykhajlenko, M. (2005). [Rets. na knyhu Stankevych Mykhajlo. Ukrains’ke khudozhnie derevo XVI—XX st. L’viv, 2002. (Instytut narodoznavstva NANU)]. Ant,13-15, 129—131 [in Ukrainian].
Nykorak, O. I. (2017). Zhyttia viddane nautsi. Narodoznavchi zoshyty, 2 (134), 491—497 [in Ukrainian].
Nykorak, O. I. (2010). Oshatna knyha Mykhajla Stankevycha «Buchach ta okolytsi. Malen’ki obrazky» (L’viv : SKIM, 2010. — 256 s. : il.). Mystetstvoznavstvo’10: naukovyj zbirnyk, 279—280. L’viv: Spilka krytykiv ta istorykiv mystetstva [in Ukrainian].
Otkovych, V. (1998). Sproba portreta. In Mykhajlo Stankevych. Bibliohrafichnyj pokazhchyk. (pp. 5—8).  L’viv: Instytut narodoznavstva NANU [in Ukrainian].
Sanots’ka, Kh. (1987, № 194, 19 zhovt.). Azhurni vytynanky. Vil’ne zhyttia [in Ukrainian].
Selivachov, M. R. (1986-1988). Monohrafichne doslidzhennia pro vytynanky (Ukrains’ki vytynanky). Narodna tvorchist’ ta etnohrafiia, 1, 79—80 [in Ukrainian].
Selivachov, M. R. (1999). [Rets. Mykhajlo Stankevych. Bibliohrafichnyj pokazhchyk. L’viv: Instytut narodoznavstva NAN Ukrainy, 1998]. Ant, 1, 47 [in Ukrainian].
Selivachov, M. R. (2004). Fundamental’ne doslidzhennia khudozhn’oho derevoobrob-nytstva. Ukrains’kyj humanitarnyj ohliad. (Vol. 10, pp. 104—114) [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych, M. Ye. (2004). Avtentychnist’ mystetstva. Pytannia teorii plastychnykh mystetstv. Vybrani tvory.  L’viv: Spilka krytykiv ta istorykiv mystetstva [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych, M. (1998). Bibliohrafichnyj pokazhchyk. L’viv: Instytut narodoznavstva NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych, M. (2015). Teoriia ramy. Vybrani pratsi z istorii i teorii mystetstva. L’viv: Spilka krytykiv ta istorykiv mystetstva [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych, M. Ye. (1986). Ukrains’ki vytynanky. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych, M. Ye. (1986). Ukrains’ke khudozhnie derevo XVI—XX st. L’viv: Afisha [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych, M. (Ed.) (1981). Ukrains’ki vytynanky: Retrospektyvna vystavka: Kataloh.  L’viv: Muzej etnohrafii ta khudozhn’oho promyslu AN URSR [in Ukrainian].
Fedoruk, O. (2002). Perednie slovo. In Stankevych M. Ukrains’ke khudozhnie derevo XVI—XX st. (pp. 5—6). L’viv: Afisha [in Ukrainian].

Read»

Our authors
Boikos’ pandemonium: categories of evil deceased
In the article have been presented some research-work on peculiarities of Boikos’ traditional demonological notions as for so-called evil deceased; on the basis of field records and ethnological literary sources quite a number of scum categories have been defined as well as essential habits, modes of behavior and functions of these personages of people’s demonology.
Read »

On field exploration of russian and belarusian ethnologists and etnolinguists in Ukrainian Polisia 1945—1980s
In the study based on a wide range of literary materials have been comprehensively characterised field research in Polisia of Ukraine, performed by Russian and Belarusian ethnologists during 1945—1980s as well as Moscow ethnolinguists and other researchers from ethnologic centres of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus in the course of realization of Ethnolinguistic Atlas of Polisia program. Particular attention has been paid to geography, methods, themes and research results of scientific projects.
Read »

Maternity ritualism by volhynians in publications of the second half XIX to the early XXI cc.
In the article have been considered some basic landmarks for fixing and publication of ethnographic materials on the maternity rites of Volhynia with analytical study in ritual elements, their kinds and territories of origin. The article has also raised a problem of gaps in studies of maternity rites of Ukrainian historio-ethnographic Volhynia.
Read »

Daily bread baking of ukrainians in the south-western ethnographical region at the late XIX to early XXI cc.
The paper has dealt with analytic study in prescriptions, signs, customs, methods, ways of selection, procurement and some peculiarities in usage of subsidiary means — water, firewood and leaves in bread baking. The final aim of the mentioned actions had been (and still is) selection of the means and ingredients fit, by their characteristics, for the backing of bread. The paper has demonstrated dependence of bread backing subsi­diary means criteria from the folk nutritional standards and world outlook stereotypes as well as from regional social and economic, natural and geographical factors and peculiarities of material culture.
Read »