« 2018. #2 (140)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2018, 2 (140), 425—435.

UDK 730:2-526.64(477.83/.86)”19/20”

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2018.02.425

Received 25.01.2018

SACRAL LANDSCAPE SCULPTURE OF HALYCHYNA OF THE END OF XX — BEGINNINGS OF THE XXI CENTURY: TYPOLOGICAL NOVATIONS AND ICONOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE IMAGE OF CHRIST

Sydor Vitalii,

PhD candidate of Design and Theory of Art Department

of Teaching and Research Institute of Art,

SHEI «Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpatian National University».

57 Taras Shevchenko str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76000, Ukraine

Abstrakt. The visual context of the sacred landscape sculpture of the Galician region during the period 1990 to 2015 is revealed. The localization of the objects being studied, the features of their functioning are determined, compositional, figurative and stylistic editions of the feed of the reproduced personalities are analyzed, as a whole, the general typological picture of the phenomenon under study is constructed. In the same channel the iconographic characterization of the sculptures of the Savior is presented. The illumination of the worker is accompanied by the definition of the established and relatively new aspects of the direct creation of such sculptures.

Keywords: sacred landscape sculpture, Galych lands, image, typology, iconography, novations.

REFERENCES

Bibliia, abo Knyhy Sviatoho Pys’ma Staroho i Novoho Zapovitu iz movy davn’oievrejs’koi j hrets’koi na ukrains’ku nanovo perekladena: 988—1988. Yuvilejne vydannia z nahody tysiacholittia khrystyianstva v Ukraini. (1988). In  Ohiienko I. (perekl.)  (mytropolyt Ilarion). B. m. : b. v. [in Ukrainian].
Bilous, L. (2012). Sakral’na narodna skul’ptura Rohatynschyny XX — pochatku XXI stolit’. Visnyk Prykarpats’koho universytetu. Mystetstvoznavstvo, 24—25,  100—105 [in Ukrainian].
Holovej, V. (2001). Metodolohichni aspekty doslidzhennia tradytsij ukrains’koho iko-nopysu (tezovyj vyklad). Ukrains’ke sakral’ne mystetstvo: tra-dytsii, suchasnist’, perspektyvy (Ukrains’ke sakral’ne mystetstvo XIII—XV stolit’): materialy III Mizhn. nauk. konferentsii, 4— 5 travnia 1995 r. L’viv; Zhovkva: Misioner [in Ukrainian].
Holubets’, O. (2001). Roman Petruk: povernennia. Obrazotvorche mystetstvo, 1, 86—87 [in Ukrainian].
Honcharenko, A.O. (2015). Transformatsii rozvytku ukrains’koi skul’ptury (v konteksti kul’turno-mystets’kykh protsesiv 1990-kh—2000-kh rr.) : dys. … kand. mys-tetstvoznavstva: 26.00.01. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Hoshovs’kyj, R.M. (2015). Dekoratyvno-semantychni chynnyky sakralizatsii kul’tovykh ob’iektiv ukraintsiv XVI — pochatku XX stolit’ (Ontolohiia. Typolohiia. Symvolika. Khudozhni zasoby): dys. … kand. mystetstvoznavstva: 26.00.01. Ivano-Frankivs’k [in Ukrainian].
Grjeber, L. (1999). Dikaja priroda kak svjashhennoe prostranstvo. In  Kolos S. & Borejko V (per.). Kievskij jekologo-kul’turnyj centr. Kiev: b. i. [in Ukrainian].
Dal’, V. (1979). Tolkovyj slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo jazyka: v 4 t. (Vol. 2 (I—O). Moskva: Russkij jazyk [in Russian].
Dundiak, I. (2012). Skul’ptura Ivano-Frankivs’ka poch. XXI st. u konteksti rozvytku suchasnoi monumental’noi relihijnoi skul’ptury. Visnyk Prykarpats’koho universytetu. Mystetstvoznavstvo, 24—25, 8—12 [in Ukrainian].
Kubijovych V. (Ed.) (1980). Entsyklopediia ukrainoznavstva: v 10 t. Paryzh; N’iu-Jork: Molode Zhyttia; Naukove tovarystvo im. T. Shevchenka u L’vovi 1955. (Vol. 9: Tymofieiev Valentyn — Khmel’nyts’kyj Bohdan, pp. 3201—3600) [in Ukrainian].
Zhurmij, N.M. (2011). Transformatsii relihijnoho svitospryjniattia u konteksti suchasnoi mis’koi skul’ptury. Visnyk DAKKKiM,  3, 89—92 [in Ukrainian].
Katrij, Yu.Ya., o. (1982). Piznaj svij obriad! Liturhijnyj rik Ukrains’koi Katolyts’koi Tserkvy. N’iu-Jork; Rym: Vyd-vo oo. Vasyliian [in Ukrainian].
Krekhovets’kyj, Ya. (2000). Bohoslov’ia ta dukhovnist’ ikony. L’viv: MMSU; Svichado [in Ukrainian].
Mozdyr, M.I. (2009). Ukrains’ka narodna memorial’na plastyka: monohrafiia. L’viv: Instytut narodoznavstva NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Muzychka, I (1994). Ukrains’ke sakral’ne mystetstvo i bohosloviia. Ukrains’ke sakral’ne mystetstvo: tradytsii, suchasnist’, perspektyvy: materia-ly Mizhn. nauk. konferentsii, 4—5 travnia 1993 r. L’viv: MMSU; Svichado [in Ukrainian].
Ohiienko, I.I. (1965). Dokhrystyians’ki viruvannia ukrains’koho narodu: Istorych-no-relihijna monohrafiia. Vinnipeh [in Ukrainian].
Osadcha, O.A. (2014). Biblijna tematyka v ukrains’kij skul’pturi 2000-kh rr. (obraz-no-stylistychnyj aspekt). Visnyk KhDADM, 3, 76—80 [in Ukrainian].
Popovych, M. (1999). Narys istorii kul’tury Ukrainy. Kyiv: ArtEk [in Ukrainian].
Protas, M. (2009). Styl’ovi stratehii rozvytku ukrains’koi skul’ptury XX—XXI st. Model’ evoliutsii. Kyiv: Ukrains’ka vydavnycha spilka [in Ukrainian].
Sydor, M.B. (2011). Halyts’ka prydorozhnia kaplytsia druhoi polovyny 19—20 stolit’: kul’turolohichnyj aspekt : dys. … kandydata mystetstvoznavstva: 26.00.01. — Drohobych [in Ukrainian].
Bilodid, I.K. (Ed. ta in.). (1077, 1979).  Slovnyk ukrains’koi movy: v 11 t. (Vol. 8: Pryroda — Riakhtlyvyj, Vol. 10 (T—F). Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1977; 1979 [in Ukrainian].
Stankevych, M.Ye. (2004). Avtentychnist’ mystetstva. Pytannia teorii plastychnykh mystetstv: Vybrani pratsi. L’viv: SKIM [in Ukrainian].
Khomiak, L.V. (2002). Memorial’na riz’ba oseredkiv narodnoho kameniarstva v Halychyni kintsia XIX—XX stolittia : dys. … kandydata mystetstvoznavstva : 17.00.06.  Ivano-Frankivs’k [in Ukrainian].

Read»

Our authors
Daily bread baking of ukrainians in the south-western ethnographical region at the late XIX to early XXI cc.
The paper has dealt with analytic study in prescriptions, signs, customs, methods, ways of selection, procurement and some peculiarities in usage of subsidiary means — water, firewood and leaves in bread baking. The final aim of the mentioned actions had been (and still is) selection of the means and ingredients fit, by their characteristics, for the backing of bread. The paper has demonstrated dependence of bread backing subsi­diary means criteria from the folk nutritional standards and world outlook stereotypes as well as from regional social and economic, natural and geographical factors and peculiarities of material culture.
Read »

Boikos’ pandemonium: categories of evil deceased
In the article have been presented some research-work on peculiarities of Boikos’ traditional demonological notions as for so-called evil deceased; on the basis of field records and ethnological literary sources quite a number of scum categories have been defined as well as essential habits, modes of behavior and functions of these personages of people’s demonology.
Read »

Traditional folk clothes of velikobychkovsky hutsuly of XIX — the first half of XX century
In the study based upon numerous field materials, literature sources as well as ethnographic, historio-cultural and regional museum collections has been performed complex analysis in traditional folk clothes by Hutzul population of Velyky Bychkiv village in Transcarpathian region. Detailed descriptions of femi­nine and masculine clothing complexes of the mentioned area have been presented. In characterizing of those main attention has been paid to the detail of cut in separate components of dress; cut of feminine shirt has been added as an illustration.
Read »

On bessarabian and moldavian ukrainians in the studies of historical ethnography
The article has thrown some light upon a sum of scientific findings got during XIX to XXI cc. in historio-ethnographic studies of Bessarabia and Moldavian Ukrainians. In the pre­sent paper has been given author’s answer to the problem of lacking progress as for the numerous themes concerning Ukrainians. State and achievements of the research-works in Ukrainians’ material and spiritual culture by the scientists of Moldavia and Ukraine through the years of independence has been exposed.
Read »