The Ethnology Notebooks. 2026. № 3 (189), 733—740
UDK339.564:745/749(477.43/.44) “1927/1935”
EXPORT OF ARTISTIC CRAFT PRODUCTS FROM PODILLIA IN 1927—1935
KAROIEVA Tetiana
- ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000000150129513
- Dr (History), Professor,
- Professor of the Department of Culture,
- Methods of Teaching History and Auxiliary Sciences of History,
- Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University,
- 32, Ostrozhskogo str., 21100, Vinnitsia, Ukraine,
- Contacts: e-mail: tetiana.karoieva@vspu.edu.ua
Abstract. Introduction. In the search for additional sources to finance industrialization in the USSR, the Bolshevik authorities sought a new category of export goods within the cultural sphere. Among other things, they began exporting artistic handicraft products, which could be regarded both as everyday household items and as luxury goods.
Problem statement. Ukrainian scholars have actively studied the Soviet export campaign aimed at selling cultural valuables abroad. Against this background, the export of handicraft products has remained largely on the margins of scholarly interest.
Purpose of the article. Using the example of Podillia, the article seeks to examine the organization of the collection of products manufactured by artistic artels for export in 1927—1935 and to clarify the impact of these export activities on the development of artistic crafts.
Results. The study outlines the main regulatory framework governing the organization of handicraft exports. According to the relevant regulations, the collection of such items was initially organized through the system of Derzhtorg of the Ukrainian SSR and the structures of industrial cooperatives. Officials of Derzhtorg regarded artistic craft products as luxury goods, and their export took place within the framework of the campaign of selling cultural heritage abroad, which ultimately proved economically unsuccessful. Due to the low efficiency of employees of local Derzhtorg offices in collecting handicraft products, this line of activity was soon curtailed, especially since the officials had no direct influence over artistic cooperatives and the producers themselves. The artels, for their part, continued to operate for a long time through cooperative structures, particularly Vukopromkredytsplka (from 1931 — Vukoppromrada). However, from 1934 the People’s Commissariat of Foreign Trade of the USSR attempted to centralize the export of artistic handicraft products.
Keywords: artistic crafts, artel (artisanal cooperative), handicrafts, cultural valuables, embroidery, Podillia.
REFERENCES
- (1967). On cottage and handicraft industry and industrial cooperation: Resolution of the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR, May 3, 1927. Decisions of the Party and Government on Economic Issues (Vol. 1, pp. 639—648). Moskva: Politizdat [in Russian].
- (1999). On the organization by the People’s Commissariat of Trade of the USSR of the export abroad of antiquities and luxury items that have no museum value: Resolution of the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR, June 28, 1927. In Industrialization of the Soviet Union: New Documents, New Facts, New Approaches (Part 2, p. 34). Moskva [in Russian].
- (1999). Memorandum of the People’s Commissariat of Trade of the USSR to the Chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR and the Council of Labor and Defense A.I. Rykov on the export of antique valuables, December 7, 1927. In Industrialization of the Soviet Union: New Documents, New Facts, New Approaches (Part 2, pp. 34—36). Moskva [in Russian].
- (1999). On the allocation and export of antique valuables: Resolution of the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR, July 24, 1928. Industrialization of the Soviet Union: New Documents, New Facts, New Approaches (Part 2, pp. 40—41). Moskva [in Russian].
- Arustamian, Zh. (1994). Sold and melted down. Landmarks of Ukraine. History & Culture, 1—2, 108—109 [in Ukrainian].
- Bilokin, S. (2005). Losses of Ukrainian cultural heritage during the famine of 1922. KyivMohyla Readings 2004 (Pp. 77—98). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
- Bilokin, S. (2001). S. Hlevaskyi’s confession about the plundering of Ukrainian cultural heritage under the Bolsheviks. Landmarks of Ukraine. History & Culture, 4, 92—109 [in Ukrainian].
- Bilokin, S. (2006). In defense of Ukrainian heritage: Art historian Fedir Ernst. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
- Bilokin, S. (2007). New studies in the history of Bolshevism (2nd ed.). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
- Nestulia, O.O. (1995). The fate of church antiquities in Ukraine, 1917—1941. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
- Kot, S. (2020). Return and restitution of cultural values in the political and cultural life of Ukraine (20th — early 21st century). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
- Nestulia, O., & Nestulia, S. (Eds.). (2002). Ukrainian cultural values in Russia: Toward dialogue. 1926—1930. Poltava [in Ukrainian].
- Hetman, D. (2010). Return and restitution of historical and cultural values in UkrainianPolishRussian relations (1920s—1930s) (PhD dissertation abstract). National University of KyivMohyla Academy [in Ukrainian].
- Skrypnyk, H. (Ed.). (2011). History of decorative art (Vol. 4). Kyiv: M.T. Rylskyi Institute of Art Studies; Folklore and Ethnology; NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
- Spaska, Ye. (2015). Materials for the history of industrial embroidery in the Kyiv region. Ethnological and art history works (Pp. 129—161). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
- Varyvonchyk, A. (2019). Organization of the industrial activity of the «Ukrkhudozhprom» concern. Bulletin of KNUKiM. Series in Arts, 40, 177—182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/24101176.40.2019.172700 [in Ukrainian].
- Zinenko, T. (2012). Export of artistic ceramic products in the 1960s—1970s. МISТ: Art, history, modernity, theory, 8, 94—111 [in Ukrainian].
- Nekrasova, M.A., & Temerin, S.M. (Eds.). (1986). Folk artistic crafts, 1917—1932: materials and documents. Moskva: Iskusstvo [in Russian].
- (1928). Correspondence with the Main Export Office of Derzhtorg of the Ukrainian SSR concerning the export of handmade artistic products and embroidery. State Archive of Vinnytsia Region. Fond R‑79. Op. 1. Spr. 63 [in Ukrainian, Russian].
- (1928—1929). Correspondence with the Main Export Office of Derzhtorg of the Ukrainian SSR on the procurement of antiques for export. State Archive of Vinnytsia Region. Fond R‑79. Op. 1. Spr. 168 [in Ukrainian, Russian].
- (1926—1929). Case file of the Zoziv embroidery cooperative artel «Tkach». State Archive of Vinnytsia Region. Fond R‑1303. Op. 1. Spr. 199 [in Ukrainian, Russian].
- Pribylskaia, E. (2015). Biography. Researches of the fine arts, 2, 111—124. Retrieved from: https://sm.etnolog.org.ua/zmist/2015/2/111.pdf (Last accessed: 16.01.2026) [in Russian].
- (1931—1933). Industrial cooperative school at the artel «Zhinocha pratsia», village of Klembivka. State Archive of Vinnytsia Region. Fond R‑1560. Op. 1. Spr. 43 [in Ukrainian, Russian].
- (1932—1933). Organizational department — personnel group of the Klembivka industrial cooperative school. State Archive of Vinnytsia Region. Fond R‑1560. Op. 1. Spr. 80 [in Ukrainian, Russian].
- (1935). Agreement and correspondence with Koverkustexport regarding goods. State Archive of Vinnytsia Region. Fond R‑1560. Op. 1. Spr. 190 [in Ukrainian, Russian].
- (1934—1935). Resolutions of the Presidium of the AllUkrainian Cooperative Council on reducing prices for export handicraft products. State Archive of Vinnytsia Region. Fond R 1560. Op. 7. Spr. 21 [in Ukrainian, Russian].
- (1933). Central Committee of the AllUnion Communist Party (Bolsheviks). Protocol № 149 of the Politburo meeting, November 15, 1933. Istoricheskie materialy. Retrieved from: https://istmat.org/node/50400 (Last accessed: 11.02.2026) [in Russian].
- Osokina, E.A. (2000). Gold for industrialization. Cahiers du Monde Russe, 41(1), 5–40. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4000/monderusse.36 [in French].