Archive

« 2017. #2 (134)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2017, 2 (134), 400—415

UDK [94(477.83­21):314.116]«16»:930.2

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2017.02.400

POPULATION OF THE VILLAGE SELYSKO OF LVIV REGION

Horbal Mariia Yulianivna, leading scientific editor

of the Institute of Ethnology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

Svobody Avenue 15, 79000, Lviv, Ukraine.

Contacts: Tel. (067)7117846; e-mail: horbal.m@gmail.com

Abstract. The history of settling of a separate village Selysko of Lviv region Pustomyty district is deducting on the background of Eastern Galicia XVII century (after turkish­tatar invasion). The materials adap­ted on the basis of shematyzms, field researches and scientific data.

Keywords: village Selysko, ancient times, Turkish­Tatar invasion, migration moves, colonists.

Received 09.02.2017

REFERENCES

Baran, V.K. & Tokars’kyj V.V. (2009). Ukraina: zakhidni zemli: 1939—1941 rr. L’viv [in Ukrainian].
Dashkevych, Ya.R. (1993). Yasyr z Ukrainy (XV — persha polovyna XVII st.) iak istoryko-demohrafichna problema. In Ukrains’kyj arkheohrafichnyj schorichnyk. Nova seriia. (Vol. 2, pp. 40—47). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Krasovs’kyj, I. (1993). Prizvyscha halyts’kykh lemkiv u XVIII st. L’viv: Kraj [in Ukrainian].
O rus’ku zemliu. (1903, 10 serpnia). Dilo [in Ukrainian].
Siredzhuk, P.S. (2008). Sotsial’no-ekonomichne stanovysche i kul’turne zhyttia nimets’koi menshyny Skhidnoi Halychyny (20—30-ti rr. XX st.): monohrafiia. Ternopil’: Ekonomichna dumka [in Ukrainian].
Fedaka, P. (2006). Formuvannia hirs’kykh poselen’. In Etnohenez ta etnichna istoriia naselennia Ukrains’kykh Karpat. (Vpl. II. Etnolohiia ta mystetstvoznavstvo, pp. 141—161). L’viv: Instytut narodoznavstva NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Vasyl’ Sokil & Hanna Sokil (zibraly). (1998). Fol’klorni materialy z otchoho kraiu. L’viv: Instytut narodoznavstva NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ vsechesnoho klyra mytropol. arkhiietsezij hreko-katolycheskoj L’vovskoj (Dali. — Shematyzm’) na rok’ 1882. (1882). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem’ Stefana Huchkovskoho [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1883. (1883). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Yns-tytuta pod upravleniem Stefana Huchkovskoho [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1884. (1884). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem Stefana Huchkovskoho [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1885. (1885). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem Stefana Huchkovskoho [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1886. (1886). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod’ zariadom O.Y. Tarnavskoho [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1887. (1887). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod’ zariadom O.Y. Tarnavskoho, 1887 [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1888. (1888). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod’ zariadom O.Y. Tarnavskoho [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1889. (1889). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod’ zariadom O.Y. Tarnavskoho [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1890. (1890). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem Yv. Pukhyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1891. (1891). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem Yv. Pukhyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1892. (1892). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem Yv. Pukhyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1893. (1893). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem Yv. Pukhyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1895. (1895). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem Yv. Pukhyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1896. (1896). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1898. (1998). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1899. (1899). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem’ Osypa Danyliuka [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1900. (1900). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Ynstytuta pod upravleniem’ Osypa Danyliuka [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1901. (1901). L’vov’: Yz’ typohrafiy Stavropyhijskoho Yn-stytuta pod upravleniem’ Osypa Danyliuka [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1902. (1902). L’vov’: Nakladom Arkhieparkhial’noho Klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1903. (1903). L’vov’: Nakladom Arkhieparkhial’noho Klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1904. (1904). L’vov’: Nakladom Arkhieparkhial’noho Klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1905. (1905). L’vov’ : Nakladom Arkhieparkhial’noho Klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ rok’ 1906. (1905). L’vov’ : Nakladom Arkhieparkhial’noho Klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1907. (1907). Zhovkva: V pechatnѣ OO. Vasyliian’ [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok’ 1908. (1908). Zhovkva: V pechatnѣ OO. Vasyliian’ [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok 1909. (1909). L’vov’: Nakladom arkhieparkhiial’noho klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok 1910. (1910). L’vov’: Nakladom arkhieparkhiial’noho klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok 1911. (1911). L’vov’: Nakladom arkhieparkhiial’noho klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok 1912. (1912). L’vov’: Nakladom arkhieparkhiial’noho klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok 1913. (1913). L’vov’: Nakladom arkhieparkhiial’noho klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ na rok 1914. (1914). L’vov’: Nakladom arkhieparkhiial’noho klyra [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm Vseho dukhovenstva hreko-katolytskoi L’vivs’koi mytropolychoi arkhiieparkhii na rik 1918. (1918). L’viv: Nakladom arkhiieparkhiial’noho dukhovenstva [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm na rik 1924. (1924). L’viv: Nakladom Arkhieparkhiial’noho dukhovenstva [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm hr.-kat. dukhovenstva L’vivs’koi arkhieparkhii na rik 1927. (1927). L’viv: Nakladom sviaschenychoi kooperatyvy «Vlasna dopomoha» [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm na rik 1928. (1928). L’viv: Nakladom sviaschenychoi kooperatyvy «Vlasna dopomoha» [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm na rik 1929. (1929). L’viv: Nakladom kantseliarii mytropolychoi konsystorii [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm na rik 1930. (1930). L’viv: Nakladom kantseliarii mytropolychoi konsystorii [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm na rik 1931/32. (1931). L’viv: Nakladom kantseliarii mytropolychoi konsystorii [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm na rik 1932/33. (1931). L’viv: Nakladom kantseliarii mytropolychoi konsystorii [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm na rik 1935/36. (1935). L’viv: Nakladom kantseliarii mytropolychoi konsystorii [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm dukhovenstva L’vivs’koi arkhieparkhii. 1938. (1937). L’viv: Nakladom mytropolychoi konsystorii [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ narodnykh’ shkol’ uchytelej v Arkhieparkhiy L’vovskoj podchy-nennykh’ L’vovskoj Ruskoj Hr. Kaѣ. Obriada Mytropol’noj Konsystoriy na rok 1866. (1866). L’vov: Typom’ Ynstytuta Stavropyhijskoho. Upravytel’ typ.: Stefan’ Huchkovskij [in Ukrainian].
Shematyzm’ narodnykh’ shkol’ uchytelej v Arkhieparkhiy L’vovskoj podchy-nennykh’ L’vovskoj Ruskoj Hr. Kaѣ. Obriada Mytropol’noj Konsystoriy na rok 1867. (1867). L’vov: Z Pechatn’ Ynstytuta Stavropyhijskoho. Upravytel’ pech. Stefan’ Huchkovskij [in Ukrainian].
Subtelny, О. (1981). Cossack Ukraine and the Turco-Islamic World. In Rethinking Ukrainian History. Edmonton.
Arkheolohiia ta starodavnia istoriia Pustomytivs’koho rajonu. Retrieved from: http://www.zamky.com.ua/istoriya/arheolo¬giya-ta-starodavnya-istoriya-pust
Hostynets’ Retrieved from: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/.
Zaslavs’kyj, V. Yak Petro Doroshenko ta Ivan Mazepa Krekhiv vid tatar i turkiv zakhyschaly. Retrieved from: http://risu.org.ua/ua/relig_tourism/religious_region/34926.
Korolivstvo Halychyny ta Volodymyrii. Retrieved from: https://uk. wikipedia.org/wiki/.
Makarchuk, V.S. Pytannia obminu naselenniam pry vrehuliuvanni pisliavoiennykh kordoniv Ukrains’koi RSR (za pidsumkamy Druhoi svitovoi vijny 1939—1945 rr.). Retrieved from: http://historylaw.lp.edu.ua/.
Na L’vivschyni rozkopaly najzakhidnishe poselennia trypil’s’koi kul’tury. Retrieved from: http://vilne.org.ua/2016/07/ %D0%BD%D0%B59.
Nimtsi v Ukraini. Retrieved from: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki.
Pol’s’ko-turets’ka vijna (1672—1676). Retrieved from: https: // uk.wikipedia.org/wiki
Yavorivs’kyj vijs’kovyj polihon. Retrieved from: https://uk.wiki¬pedia.org/wiki

Read»

Our authors
Traditional folk clothes of velikobychkovsky hutsuly of XIX — the first half of XX century
In the study based upon numerous field materials, literature sources as well as ethnographic, historio-cultural and regional museum collections has been performed complex analysis in traditional folk clothes by Hutzul population of Velyky Bychkiv village in Transcarpathian region. Detailed descriptions of femi­nine and masculine clothing complexes of the mentioned area have been presented. In characterizing of those main attention has been paid to the detail of cut in separate components of dress; cut of feminine shirt has been added as an illustration.
Read »

On bessarabian and moldavian ukrainians in the studies of historical ethnography
The article has thrown some light upon a sum of scientific findings got during XIX to XXI cc. in historio-ethnographic studies of Bessarabia and Moldavian Ukrainians. In the pre­sent paper has been given author’s answer to the problem of lacking progress as for the numerous themes concerning Ukrainians. State and achievements of the research-works in Ukrainians’ material and spiritual culture by the scientists of Moldavia and Ukraine through the years of independence has been exposed.
Read »

Wax candle as ukrainian Christmas and epiphany ritualistic text
For the first time in native ethnology the article has brought some results of special study in sign functionality of a wax candle under the context of Ukrainian Christmas and Epiphany ritualistic text (ritualism of Christmas Eve, New Year, Epiphany Eve and Feast of Epiphany). The study has stated extremely high semiotic position of a wax candle as projection of Sun, mediator between the spheres of sacral and prophane elements, symbolic analogue of human existence, apotropy, cultural symbol re-establishing borders of acculturated space.
Read »

Boikos’ pandemonium: categories of evil deceased
In the article have been presented some research-work on peculiarities of Boikos’ traditional demonological notions as for so-called evil deceased; on the basis of field records and ethnological literary sources quite a number of scum categories have been defined as well as essential habits, modes of behavior and functions of these personages of people’s demonology.
Read »