Archive

« 2017. #2 (134)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2017, 2 (134), 441—447

UDK 7.038.6

DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2017.02.441

INNOVATIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES IN MODERN ART

Bystriakova Valentyna, Associate Professor

in Kiev National University of Technology and Design

Department of drawing and painting,

Volodymyra Nemyrovycha-Danchenko Street, 2, 01011, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Contacts: e-mail: krg@knutd.edu.ua

Osadcha Alla Mykolaivna, Senior teacher

in Kiev National University of Technology and Design

Department of drawing and painting,

Volodymyra Nemyrovycha-Danchenko Street, 2, 01011, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Contacts: E-mail: alla_0203@ukr.net

Pilhuk Olesia,

Kiev National University of Technology and Design

Department of drawing and painting,

Volodymyra Nemyrovycha-Danchenko Street, 2, 01011, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Contacts: e-mail: krg@knutd.edu.ua

Abstract. In the article the attempt of analysis of the systems of innovative approaches and innovative technologies in a modern art is carried out. The different scientific and legal going is offered near interpretation of term «innovation». Understanding of essence of innovations in a culture is investigated. The features of application of innovative technologies are considered in the diffe­rent spheres of culture, in particular in fine art. The role of innovative technologies is exposed in the postmodern art.

Keywords: innovations, technologies, modern art, culture, cultureronik, values, tradition, postmodern, conception.

Received 14.03.2017

REFERENCES

Balabanov, I.T. (2001). Innovacionyj menedzhment. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter [in Russian].
Volyk, N.H. (2013). Innovatsijni suspil’ni protsesy i moral’nyj vybir. Totallogy XXI. Postneklasichni doslidzhennia, 30, 265—273 [in Ukrainian].
Vujma, A.H. (2013). Tradytsii ta novatorstvo iak dvi protylezhnosti v dialektytsi kul’tury. In Problema tradytsii v ukrains’kij kul’turi: materialy Vse-ukrains’koi naukovopraktychnoikh konferentsii kursantiv, studentiv ta molodykh uchenykh (pp.36—38). Kharkiv: NUTsZU [in Ukrainian].
Gvishiani, D.M. (2006). Dialektika i sistemnyj analiz. Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].
Druker, P.F. (2007). Zadachi menedzhmenta v XXI veke. Moskva: Vil’jams [in Russian].
Zhaldak, H. & Simchenko, N. (2012). Klasyfikatsiia innovatsij ta ikh sotsial’nyj pidvyd. In Ekonomichnyj analiz (Vol. 10 (4), pp. 92—95) [in Ukrainian].
Kyrylenko, K.M. (2015). Pidkhody do rozuminnia innovatsijnoi kul’tury v konteksti su-chasnoho naukovoho dyskursu ta ikh naskrizni idei. Pytannia kul’turolohii, 31, 64—71 [in Ukrainian].
Koiuda, O.P. & Nebylytsia, O.A. (2009). Innovatsijna kul’tura ta ii kharakterni osoblyvosti. Problemy nauky, 7, 15—20 [in Ukrainian].
Konvers’kyj, A.Ye. (Ed.). (2013). Kul’turolohiia: pidruch. dlia studentiv vysch. navch. zakl. Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian].
Liotar, Zh.F. & Shmako N.A. (per. s fr.). (1998). Sostojanie postmoderna = La condition postmoderne. Sankt-Peterburg: Aletejja [in Russian].
Miliutina, Yu.S. (2011). Dyskusijni pytannia schodo vyznachennia poniat’ «innovatsiia» ta «novovvedennia». Universytets’ki naukovi zapysky, 4, 454—462 [in Ukrainian].
Molchanova, L.A. (2011). Innovacii v zhivopisi vtoroj poloviny XX veka. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovanija, 6 (31), 201—202 [in Russian].
Molchanova, L.A. (2010). Ponjatija «innovacija» i «tradicija» v iskusstve. In Snitkovskie chtenija. (pp. 37—43). Barnaul: Altajskij dom pechati [in Russian].
Sydorenko, V. (Ed.). (2006). Narysy z istorii obrazotvorchoho mystetstva Ukrainy XX st. (Vol. 2). Kyiv: Intertekhnolohiia [in Ukrainian].
Nepomnjashhij, A.V. & Pisarenko B.I. (2007). Innovacionnoe obrazovanie: dostizhenija i perspektivy. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnja, 7, 14—19 [in Russian].
Nesterenko, O.S. (2013). Klasyfikatsiia vydiv innovatsij ta efektiv vid ikh vprovadzhennia. Visnyk sotsial’noekonomichnykh doslidzhen’, 4, 112—117 [in Ukrainian].
Gricanov, A.A. (Ed.). (2007). Novejshij filosofskij slovar’. Postmodernizm. Minsk: Sovremennyj literator [in Russian].
Pro innovatsijnu diial’nist’: Zakon Ukrainy: zi zminamy. (2003). In Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR),13, 93 [in Ukrainian].
Sobol’, T.V. (2014). Filosofskij analiz soderzhanija ponjatij «kul’tura», «innovacija» i «innovacionnaja kul’tura». Molodoj uchenyj, 13, 337—341 [in Russian].
Starovojt, O.V. (2014). Kreatyvna pryroda innovatsijnoi kul’tury. Visnyk Instytutu rozvytku dytyny. Seriia: Filosofiia, pedahohika, psykholohiia, 32, 36—42 [in Ukrainian].
SukhovejKhamm, Yu.O. (2012). Teoretychni pidkhody do traktuvannia poniattia innovatsij u suchasnij naukovij literature. Naukovi pratsi MAUP 4, 180—184 [in Ukrainian].
Usovskaja, Je.A. (2006). Postmodernizm. Minsk: TetraSistem [in Russian].
Ushkalov, L. (2011). Vid baroko do postmodernu: esei. Kyiv: Hrani T [in Ukrainian].
Shumpeter, J. (2007). Teorija jekonomicheskogo razvitija. Moskva: Jeksmo [in Russian].
Jepshtejn, M.N. (2004). Znak probela: O budushhem gumanitarnyh nauk. Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [in Russian].

Read»

Our authors
Maternity ritualism by volhynians in publications of the second half XIX to the early XXI cc.
In the article have been considered some basic landmarks for fixing and publication of ethnographic materials on the maternity rites of Volhynia with analytical study in ritual elements, their kinds and territories of origin. The article has also raised a problem of gaps in studies of maternity rites of Ukrainian historio-ethnographic Volhynia.
Read »

Daily bread baking of ukrainians in the south-western ethnographical region at the late XIX to early XXI cc.
The paper has dealt with analytic study in prescriptions, signs, customs, methods, ways of selection, procurement and some peculiarities in usage of subsidiary means — water, firewood and leaves in bread baking. The final aim of the mentioned actions had been (and still is) selection of the means and ingredients fit, by their characteristics, for the backing of bread. The paper has demonstrated dependence of bread backing subsi­diary means criteria from the folk nutritional standards and world outlook stereotypes as well as from regional social and economic, natural and geographical factors and peculiarities of material culture.
Read »

Boikos’ pandemonium: categories of evil deceased
In the article have been presented some research-work on peculiarities of Boikos’ traditional demonological notions as for so-called evil deceased; on the basis of field records and ethnological literary sources quite a number of scum categories have been defined as well as essential habits, modes of behavior and functions of these personages of people’s demonology.
Read »

Traditional folk clothes of velikobychkovsky hutsuly of XIX — the first half of XX century
In the study based upon numerous field materials, literature sources as well as ethnographic, historio-cultural and regional museum collections has been performed complex analysis in traditional folk clothes by Hutzul population of Velyky Bychkiv village in Transcarpathian region. Detailed descriptions of femi­nine and masculine clothing complexes of the mentioned area have been presented. In characterizing of those main attention has been paid to the detail of cut in separate components of dress; cut of feminine shirt has been added as an illustration.
Read »